Re: aliases on CARP interface

2005-10-13 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Then the redundant IP should be on the carp interface Are you going to use carp on the external (public) interface ? In order to use failover, yes. We are moving from single to dual 3.7 FW's with CARP. The external interface has a lot of binated aliases and I am unsure if they are to go i

Re: aliases on CARP interface

2005-10-13 Thread Léo Goehrs
Then the redundant IP should be on the carp interface Leo -Message d'origine- De : Per olof Ljungmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyi : jeudi 13 octobre 2005 10:40 @ : Lio Goehrs Cc : misc@openbsd.org Objet : Re: aliases on CARP interface > Are you going to use carp on the

Re: aliases on CARP interface

2005-10-13 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Are you going to use carp on the external (public) interface ? In order to use failover, yes. We are moving from single to dual 3.7 FW's with CARP. The external interface has a lot of binated aliases and I am unsure if they are to go into hostname.carpN or stay as they are in hostname.ext_i

Re: aliases on CARP interface

2005-10-13 Thread Léo Goehrs
Are you going to use carp on the external (public) interface ? Lio -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Per olof Ljungmark Envoyi : jeudi 13 octobre 2005 10:00 @ : misc@openbsd.org Objet : aliases on CARP interface We are moving from s

aliases on CARP interface

2005-10-13 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
We are moving from single to dual 3.7 FW's with CARP. The external interface has a lot of binated aliases and I am unsure if they are to go into hostname.carpN or stay as they are in hostname.ext_if. Could someone please enlighten me? Thanks.