> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:00:38 +
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: adjusting the mtu with vr(4)
>
> On 2007/11/27 11:32, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
>>> If you run ppp
On 2007/11/27 11:32, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> > If you run pppoe over the vr(4) interface so why do you need to reduce the
> > MTU of the interface. Do you like to break your network before it is
> > working?
> >
>
> Read the MTU/MSS issues of pppoe(4)
You need to read it again, paying more car
> If you run pppoe over the vr(4) interface so why do you need to reduce the
> MTU of the interface. Do you like to break your network before it is
> working?
>
Read the MTU/MSS issues of pppoe(4)
_
Celeb spotting Play CelebMashup a
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:22:23AM +, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 November 2007 00:00:45 Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> >> Is the support for adjusting the mtu with VIA Rhine-II chipset based
> >> interfaces missing because of hardware limitations or because support for
> >> it hasn't
On 2007/11/27 09:44, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> > Use the suggested pf setting. It is the right way do handle it and
> > there will be no ill side effects.
>
> Ok, so where does this statement from the pppoe(4) man page come in to play?
>
> "Note that setting the MSS this way can have undesirabl
> Use the suggested pf setting. It is the right way do handle it and
> there will be no ill side effects.
Ok, so where does this statement from the pppoe(4) man page come in to play?
"Note that setting the MSS this way can have undesirable effects, such as
reducing TCP/IP throughput, and interfe
Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007 00:00:45 Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
Is the support for adjusting the mtu with VIA Rhine-II chipset based
interfaces missing because of hardware limitations or because support for
it hasn't been written yet??
# ifconfig vr0 mtu 1492
ifconfig: SIO
> On Sunday 25 November 2007 00:00:45 Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
>> Is the support for adjusting the mtu with VIA Rhine-II chipset based
>> interfaces missing because of hardware limitations or because support for
>> it hasn't been written yet??
>>
>> # ifconfig vr0 mtu 1492
>> ifconfig: SIOCSIFMTU:
On Sunday 25 November 2007 00:00:45 Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> Is the support for adjusting the mtu with VIA Rhine-II chipset based
> interfaces missing because of hardware limitations or because support for
> it hasn't been written yet??
>
> # ifconfig vr0 mtu 1492
> ifconfig: SIOCSIFMTU: Inapprop
Is the support for adjusting the mtu with VIA Rhine-II chipset based
interfaces missing because of hardware limitations or because support for it
hasn't been written yet??
# ifconfig vr0 mtu 1492
ifconfig: SIOCSIFMTU: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Sevan / Venture37
10 matches
Mail list logo
