I think ext3fs is a good starting point. Once I get confortable with
kernel programming I'll work on porting/implementing other FS.
Thanks for the advice.
Daniel.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 6:35 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> - Original Message -
> | Hi, I'd like to start working on the open
I won't have something testable for a while but I'll keep that in
mind. Thanks :)
Daniel
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Gregor Best wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:24:31PM -0300, Daniel Testa wrote:
>> ok... I think I'll follow your recommendation Ted. I'll work on adding
>> ext3fs support.
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:24:31PM -0300, Daniel Testa wrote:
> ok... I think I'll follow your recommendation Ted. I'll work on adding
> ext3fs support.
> [...]
If you need someone testing that, I'd be glad to get my external hd's
file system trashed by experimental journaling code.
Gregor
[
- Original Message -
| Hi, I'd like to start working on the openbsd kernel. I thought about
| adding JFS (http://jfs.sourceforge.net/) to it.
|
| Do you know if there's anyone already working on this? I cannot access
| the bug tracking system (seems to be down)
|
| It seems that the JFS m
ok... I think I'll follow your recommendation Ted. I'll work on adding
ext3fs support.
Thanks to all of you guys for your advice.
Regards.
Daniel.
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011, joshua stein wrote:
>>> ok, so... how can do it in such a way it can go i
> I think they maybe have the bugs out, but they were still fixing some
> serious issues very recently, and it took us years to get the existing
> softdep code stabilized.
i'm not sure if netbsd's journaling code is any better, but they
also have something for ffs:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/so
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011, joshua stein wrote:
>> ok, so... how can do it in such a way it can go into the tree? should
>> I re-implement JFS?
>
> maybe look into SU+J?
>
> http://www.mckusick.com/BSDCan/bsdcan2010.pdf
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NuhRkiInvA
>
> http://jeffr-tech.livejournal.
> ok, so... how can do it in such a way it can go into the tree? should
> I re-implement JFS?
maybe look into SU+J?
http://www.mckusick.com/BSDCan/bsdcan2010.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NuhRkiInvA
http://jeffr-tech.livejournal.com/22716.html
ok, so... how can do it in such a way it can go into the tree? should
I re-implement JFS?
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:57 PM, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On 07/04/11 15:51, Daniel Testa wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I'd like to start working on the openbsd kernel. I thought about
>> adding JFS (http://jfs.sourceforge.n
On 07/04/11 15:51, Daniel Testa wrote:
Hi, I'd like to start working on the openbsd kernel. I thought about
adding JFS (http://jfs.sourceforge.net/) to it.
Do you know if there's anyone already working on this? I cannot access
the bug tracking system (seems to be down)
It seems that the JFS mai
2011/7/4 Daniel Testa :
> it is ok to port this kind of source code or a reimplementation is preferred?
No. Yes.
http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
Hi, I'd like to start working on the openbsd kernel. I thought about
adding JFS (http://jfs.sourceforge.net/) to it.
Do you know if there's anyone already working on this? I cannot access
the bug tracking system (seems to be down)
It seems that the JFS maintenance is being carried out in kernel.o
12 matches
Mail list logo
