Try disabling apm.
# config -e -o /nbsd /bsd
ukc> disable apm
252 apm0 disabled
ukc> quit
# cp /bsd /obsd
# mv /nbsd /bsd
# reboot
If that speeds it up you have the "hlt hlt" issue. it's fixed in
current and stable
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Hi All,
I just built a OpenBSD 3.7 samba file server for my home lan. It's a P3
500, 128mb RAM, with a 2 gig IDE HDD for the OS and two x Maxtor 200 GB
IDE drives for data.
Everything is working fine except that when I copy files to the box from
a Windows XP box the
On 7/19/05, Gary Clemans-Gibbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgot about the /dev/null idea. interesting result. I scp'd a 10 Mb
> file from my gentoo box and it completed fast in a few seconds - speed
> 3.3 Mb/s. Not great but faster than the other experiences.
>
> I then did the same with a 2.5
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> Darren Tucker wrote:
>> Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
>>
>>> Also I have just grabbed the stable branch from cvs and am running stable
>>> GENERIC and still doesn't fix it. Just a recap - the problem is not just
>>> samba writes to either of the data
Hi,
...on Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:35:37PM -0400, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
> Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Alexander Bochmann:
> > Just to drop this in again - at least here, writing from
> > an OS X (10.2 or 10.3) system to a Samba 2 server is
> > abysmally slow up to
Darren Tucker wrote:
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Also I have just grabbed the stable branch from cvs and am running
stable GENERIC and still doesn't fix it. Just a recap - the problem is
not just samba writes to either of the data disks from the network via
samba or scp are painfully slow. Rea
Darren Tucker wrote:
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Also I have just grabbed the stable branch from cvs and am running
stable GENERIC and still doesn't fix it. Just a recap - the problem is
not just samba writes to either of the data disks from the network via
samba or scp are painfully slow. Rea
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Also I have just grabbed the stable branch from cvs and am running
stable GENERIC and still doesn't fix it. Just a recap - the problem is
not just samba writes to either of the data disks from the network via
samba or scp are painfully slow. Reads from the box to the
John Brooks wrote:
How about a nic from a different mfr? Using another good 'dc' nic
doesn't
rule out a basic hardware incompatibility related directly to that brand
of nic card coupled with your other hardware.
JB
.
Even though it worked fine with RH7.3 a three + year old OS ?
I've
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> I've tried a couple of things. Firstly I swapped out the NIC for a
> different brand, no change. Writes god-awful slow, reads nice and zippy.
When you swapped out the NIC, did you try a non-dc NIC? Maybe a
different slot?
> $ netstat -in
> dc0 1500 192.168.20/ 1
> > How about a nic from a different mfr? Using another good 'dc' nic
doesn't
> > rule out a basic hardware incompatibility related directly to that brand
> > of nic card coupled with your other hardware.
> >
> > JB
> >
> > .
> >
>
> Even though it worked fine with RH7.3 a three + year old OS ?
I
> > Sounds like a bad nic. If you have a spare, you might try
> swapping with it.
> >
> > Also, what's the other machine and what is it running?
> >
>
> The NIC is fine, and yes I swapped it out early on as well as the cable
> and the port on the switch. I've also tried a crossover cable. I'v
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:50:03PM -0400, Don Koch wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I heeded your words of wisdom and after some rummaging I found a crossover
> > cable. Hooked it up the same winXP box direct and the exact same result.
>
> Sounds like a bad nic. If you have a spare, you mi
Don Koch wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I heeded your words of wisdom and after some rummaging I found a crossover
cable. Hooked it up the same winXP box direct and the exact same result.
Sounds like a bad nic. If you have a spare, you might try swapping with it.
Also, what's the other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I heeded your words of wisdom and after some rummaging I found a crossover
> cable. Hooked it up the same winXP box direct and the exact same result.
Sounds like a bad nic. If you have a spare, you might try swapping with it.
Also, what's the other machine and what i
Tim Hammerquist wrote:
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Yes, I've tried different cables and different ports on the switch.
This hardware has all been used before together. I cycled the power to
the switch (can't find a reset button) and no change. Via samba or SCP
it takes 7 minutes to write a file
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> Yes, I've tried different cables and different ports on the switch.
> This hardware has all been used before together. I cycled the power to
> the switch (can't find a reset button) and no change. Via samba or SCP
> it takes 7 minutes to write a file to the server and 1
Avtar Gill wrote:
Stephen Marley wrote:
Have you tried a crossover cable, bypassing the switch?
Words of wisdom right there. I would definitely try a crossover cable
between the OpenBSD server and your client machine. That will show you
whether the problem lies with Samba or elsewhere.
Stephen Marley wrote:
Have you tried a crossover cable, bypassing the switch?
Words of wisdom right there. I would definitely try a crossover cable
between the OpenBSD server and your client machine. That will show you
whether the problem lies with Samba or elsewhere. I remember
experienc
--On 19 July 2005 10:46 -0500, Daniel Ramaley wrote:
I've had this problem before. Other protocols work OK (not great, but
OK), but Samba is gets modem speeds on a fast ethernet connection.
I've had poor speeds samba->windows before and sometimes been able to
fix it by just disabling and re-e
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:57:33PM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> Yes, I've tried different cables and different ports on the switch. This
> hardware has all been used before together. I cycled the power to the
> switch (can't find a reset button) and no change. Via samba or SCP it
> takes
I've had this problem before. Other protocols work OK (not great, but
OK), but Samba is gets modem speeds on a fast ethernet connection. I've
had some success in the past by manually specifying the network speed
and duplexing. See "man hostname.if" for info on how to do that (pay
particular att
Stephen Marley wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:28:17PM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
A little bit more info,
i ran the following...
.
$ ifconfig -m dc0
dc0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
address: 00:50:bf:9c:62:e4
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
stat
On 7/19/05, Stephen Marley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:28:17PM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> > A little bit more info,
> >
> > i ran the following...
> > snip
dont forget to use netstat -i (-e on windows) to look
for errors on the line, which would be indicative o
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:28:17PM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> A little bit more info,
>
> i ran the following...
> >
> > .
> >
> $ ifconfig -m dc0
>
> dc0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> address: 00:50:bf:9c:62:e4
> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
> sta
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 11:15 PM -0700 7/18/05, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Thanks David,
I just tried that line but it seems to be the same or if
anything it seems even slower.
I missed the start of this thread, but make sure that you do not
have a duplex-mismatch with your ethernet car
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Alexander Bochmann:
> ...on Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:56:03AM -0700, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
>
> > I've seen this same phenomenon when copying to from my OSX Powerbook and
> > my fileserver (running both FreeBSD 5 and Gentoo Linux), with the OSX
At 11:15 PM -0700 7/18/05, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Thanks David,
I just tried that line but it seems to be the same or if
anything it seems even slower.
I missed the start of this thread, but make sure that you do not
have a duplex-mismatch with your ethernet cards. You want to be
sure you
...on Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:56:03AM -0700, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
> I've seen this same phenomenon when copying to from my OSX Powerbook and
> my fileserver (running both FreeBSD 5 and Gentoo Linux), with the OSX
> acting as samba client.
Just to drop this in again - at least here, writing f
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:34:04PM +0200, Michael Hamerski wrote:
> the FAQ which you refer to mentions 1M per 1G of storage, so that's not
> really 1G of RAM for this system, is it? or is there a reason I'm missing?
no...256M would in theory do it (assuming nothing bigger than around
200G in on
Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote:
Or you could disable apm0 and see if that helps.
-Original Message-
From: David Gwynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 July 2005 01:57 PM
To: Gary Clemans-Gibbon
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Writes to samba server very, very slow
* Michael Hamerski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-19 14:57]:
> I am curious as I have a number of lower-end file-serving systems with
> 200G - 500G and usually 256M RAM and have never been bit by a fsck
> slowdown, even rebuilding raidframe parity is tolerable. Granted I have
> partitions usually
Nick Holland wrote:
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Hi All,
I just built a OpenBSD 3.7 samba file server for my home lan. It's a P3
500, 128mb RAM, with a 2 gig IDE HDD for the OS and two x Maxtor 200 GB
IDE drives for data.
whoa.
no where near enough RAM.
Trip over the power cord, you will end u
Or you could disable apm0 and see if that helps.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Gwynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 July 2005 01:57 PM
> To: Gary Clemans-Gibbon
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Writes to samba server very, very slow
>
>
>
From: "Gary Clemans-Gibbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for your reply Tim. If anything it makes me feel worse. I was
hoping it was something easily fixed.
I just tried transferring a 50 Mb file to the OBSD samba box from win
using SCP. Again very slow writes but much faster reads. The 50 Mb f
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just built a OpenBSD 3.7 samba file server for my home lan. It's a P3
> 500, 128mb RAM, with a 2 gig IDE HDD for the OS and two x Maxtor 200 GB
> IDE drives for data.
whoa.
no where near enough RAM.
Trip over the power cord, you will end up swapping dur
file locally?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Gary Clemans-Gibbon
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 3:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Writes to samba server very, very slow
Thanks for your reply Tim. If anything it
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Tim. If anything it makes me feel worse. I was
> hoping it was something easily fixed.
>
> I just tried transferring a 50 Mb file to the OBSD samba box from win
> using SCP. Again very slow writes but much faster reads. The 50 Mb
> file took about
Thanks for your reply Tim. If anything it makes me feel worse. I was
hoping it was something easily fixed.
I just tried transferring a 50 Mb file to the OBSD samba box from win
using SCP. Again very slow writes but much faster reads. The 50 Mb file
took about 7 mins to transfer to the OBSD box
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> David Gwynne wrote:
> > Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> > > Everything is working fine except that when I copy files to the
> > > box from a Windows XP box the transfers are very slow, like
> > > 9 minutes for a 48 Mb file. Copying the same file back to the win
> > > box
This is really puzzling me, please someone help me out.
I've tried a couple of things. Firstly I swapped out the NIC for a
different brand, no change. Writes god-awful slow, reads nice and zippy.
I did some googling and tried some things. Here are the results of
ifconfig -a
netstat -in
netsta
Thanks David,
I just tried that line but it seems to be the same or if anything it
seems even slower.
Gary
David Gwynne wrote:
I would suggest looking at the socket options parameter in /etc/samba/
smb.conf. I have the following in my smb.conf and transfer speeds seem
to perform a lot bett
Hi All,
I just built a OpenBSD 3.7 samba file server for my home lan. It's a P3
500, 128mb RAM, with a 2 gig IDE HDD for the OS and two x Maxtor 200 GB
IDE drives for data.
Everything is working fine except that when I copy files to the box from
a Windows XP box the transfers are very slow, li
43 matches
Mail list logo
