Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread Breen Ouellette
Darrin Chandler wrote: Ask Gates, Ballmer and crew what MS's goals are. Or find it on the MS site. If none of that works you can speculate (I'm not going to). Do you think their goals fall as much in line with what you want as does OpenBSD's goals? Actually, this is very easy and does not req

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 01:37:24PM -0700, akonsu wrote: > in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service > packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a > service pack, this is not a proper implementation. This is a nice idea, but everyone makes

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread Karsten McMinn
On 6/2/06, Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (including captain fucktrust) has had any relevant input. Can't we all just get along ... and let this thread die a quiet death? in a second don quixote. 1) were all subscribed to misc@ :: use the force :: resist the reply all button. 2) htt

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread Tony Abernethy
akonsu wrote: > > in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service > packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a > service pack, this is not a proper implementation. Exactly. (And I don't seem to hear a lot about keeping OpenBSD patched up-to-

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread Dan Farrell
ong ... and let this thread die a quiet death? danno -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Pancer Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 4:18 PM To: akonsu Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd On Fri, 2006-06-02 a

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread Eric Pancer
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 20:48:06 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... > you're just a warm and fuzzy kind of guy, aren't you? > Only on friday's.

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread pauljgreene
-- Original message -- From: Eric Pancer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Who the fuck are you to trust? you're just a warm and fuzzy kind of guy, aren't you?

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread akonsu
in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a service pack, this is not a proper implementation. konstantin 2006/6/2, misiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > akonsu schrieb: > > no way. trust me. ;) > > >

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread akonsu
i am sorry you are on this list. konstantin 2006/6/2, Eric Pancer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 12:58:43 -0700, akonsu wrote... > > > no way. trust me. ;) > > Who the fuck are you to trust?

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread Eric Pancer
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 12:58:43 -0700, akonsu wrote... > no way. trust me. ;) Who the fuck are you to trust?

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread akonsu
no way. trust me. ;) We'll see, like many other security features in Windows, if they implement > it *properly*. > > DS

Re: Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread Spruell, Darren-Perot
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hey did you hear that in Windows vista they implemented ASLR > , somethink > similar to the technology of random memory allocation in open > bsd. So I gues > Windows is copying bsd. Cool. We'll see, like many other security features in Windows, if they implement it *pr

Windows to "copy" open bsd

2006-06-02 Thread Diaconescu Stefan Andrei
Hey did you hear that in Windows vista they implemented ASLR , somethink similar to the technology of random memory allocation in open bsd. So I gues Windows is copying bsd. Cool.