Dan Farrell
> Cc: OpenBSD BSD
> Subject: Re: Why Linus Torvalds won't donate to OpenSSH
>
> On Apr 11, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Dan Farrell wrote:
>
> > Seriously... this is a troll.
> >
> > This is like electronic insurgency designed to get OBSD
> supporters
On Apr 11, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Dan Farrell wrote:
> Seriously... this is a troll.
>
> This is like electronic insurgency designed to get OBSD supporters in
> another huff with the Linux world... hasn't bcw(4) provided enough for
> that purpose?
>
Bless you , Danno. When you're right, you're right.
The great thing about it is that people perusing the archives will see
the trollfest and probably not get this far to see us cluing in and
being calm and civil.
-Nick
On 4/11/07, Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seriously... this is a troll.
This is like electronic insurgency designed to
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 8:44 AM
To: Kernel Monkey
Cc: Damien Miller; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Why Linus Torvalds won't donate to OpenSSH
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 03:06, Kernel Monkey wrote:
> On 4/10/07, Damien Miller wrote:
> > Two points:
> >
> > 1.
Nice bounce...
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at chaossolutions.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
64.233.167.27 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 5
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 03:06, Kernel Monkey wrote:
> On 4/10/07, Damien Miller wrote:
> > Two points:
> >
> > 1. Please don't post private email. (Apologies if you obtained his
> > permission to post).
> >
> > 2. Who really cares? I'd much rather see contibutions from companies who
> > shi
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:27:48 +1000 (EST)
Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
> > Which commercial *NIX that's still alive is more of a security
> > thread and covered with the same level of stability problems as
> > GNU/Linux? One really stops co
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> Which commercial *NIX that's still alive is more of a security thread
> and covered with the same level of stability problems as GNU/Linux? One
> really stops counting remote exploits for GNU/Linux very soon,
> otherwise one would have to dedicate one's
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:27:55 +0930
"Adam Hawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I recently wrote Linus Torvalds asking why I don't see his name
> > listed on the OpenBSD donations page
> > (http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html), since I figured he uses
> > OpenSSH.
>
> Apart from the fact that wa
On 4/10/07, Damien Miller wrote:
Two points:
1. Please don't post private email. (Apologies if you obtained his
permission to post).
2. Who really cares? I'd much rather see contibutions from companies who
ship OpenSSH in their products and list "SSH support" as a feature on
their glossy
> I recently wrote Linus Torvalds asking why I don't see his name listed
> on the OpenBSD donations page (http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html),
> since I figured he uses OpenSSH.
Apart from the fact that was a private email from Linus to you and you
broadcast it publically (if you really did ema
Two points:
1. Please don't post private email. (Apologies if you obtained his
permission to post).
2. Who really cares? I'd much rather see contibutions from companies who
ship OpenSSH in their products and list "SSH support" as a feature on
their glossy brochures than shaking down othe
I recently wrote Linus Torvalds asking why I don't see his name listed
on the OpenBSD donations page (http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html),
since I figured he uses OpenSSH.
This was the reply I got back:
From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
I suspect
13 matches
Mail list logo
