Re: What's wrong with these pf rules

2005-07-31 Thread stan
Thanks, Aactually the problem was that I was fogetting the -e argument to pfctl. At least on 3.5 pfctl does not compaiain, nor does it change the active rules, if you forget this flag. On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 10:57:59AM -0700, Allie D wrote: > Try pass in on from... > stan([EMAIL PROTECTED])@

Re: What's wrong with these pf rules

2005-07-31 Thread Allie D
Try pass in on from... stan([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:36:55PM -0400: > I'm testing a new set of carp firewalls, and I've created a test network > off of them on my main network. I've added a route tp this network, but pf > is droping all packets to it. > > I've added rules to pf.

What's wrong with these pf rules

2005-07-31 Thread stan
I'm testing a new set of carp firewalls, and I've created a test network off of them on my main network. I've added a route tp this network, but pf is droping all packets to it. I've added rules to pf.conf that look like this: pass from any to 170.95.106.128/25 pass from 170.95.106.128/25 to any