Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
* Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-16 02:05]:
Fred Crowson wrote:
However when I try to connect using cu I don't get any output:
zaurus:fred /home/fred> cu -l /dev/cuaU0 -s19200
Well, it seems there are usb<->serial converters, which do not support
19200
* Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-16 02:05]:
> Fred Crowson wrote:
> >However when I try to connect using cu I don't get any output:
> >
> >zaurus:fred /home/fred> cu -l /dev/cuaU0 -s19200
>
Well, it seems there are usb<->serial converters, which do not support
19200 baud. At least
* Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-16 02:05]:
> Fred Crowson wrote:
> >However when I try to connect using cu I don't get any output:
> >
> >zaurus:fred /home/fred> cu -l /dev/cuaU0 -s19200
>
> Just a stupid idea, but shouldn't you use ttyU0 instead of cuaU0?
that's indeed a stupid i
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Fred Crowson wrote:
However when I try to connect using cu I don't get any output:
zaurus:fred /home/fred> cu -l /dev/cuaU0 -s19200
Just a stupid idea, but shouldn't you use ttyU0 instead of cuaU0?
I've always used cua as I'm dialing out to the machine on the end of t
Fred Crowson wrote:
However when I try to connect using cu I don't get any output:
zaurus:fred /home/fred> cu -l /dev/cuaU0 -s19200
Just a stupid idea, but shouldn't you use ttyU0 instead of cuaU0?
--
Antoine
Hi misc@,
I have just bought a usb to serial converter which is recognized as:
uftdi0 at uhub0 port 2
uftdi0: FTDI FT232R USB UART, rev 2.00/6.00, addr 2
ucom0 at uftdi0 portno 1
However when I try to connect using cu I don't get any output:
zaurus:fred /home/fred> cu -l /dev/cuaU0 -s19200
Con
6 matches
Mail list logo