Tony Sarendal said:
> Now about netstat on your openbsd box ?
> netstat -I -w10
results:
(netstat -I em1 -w1)
em1 inem1 out total in total out
packets errs packets errs colls packets errs packets errs colls
45461 023878 0 0138684 0
Tony Sarendal said:
> Now about netstat on your openbsd box ?
> netstat -I -w10
I will try that tomorrow, thanks!
also any opinions whether or not the amd64 port of
openbsd may perform better ? even though I'm running
a cheap hack of the amd64 platform(EM64T). I wanted
to go full opteron though
On Thursday 09 June 2005 22:00, nate wrote:
> Tony Sarendal said:
> > When it comes to network performance most plattforms have limitations in
> > packets per second before bandwidth. Please post the performance in pps
> > also,
> > as that is more interesting and more relevant, especially in the G
Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
I don't know if this will help, but you might also want to look into
piloting -current's idle loop fix.
I'm in a similar situation (and similar hardware, em(4) cards in
particular) as the OP. I'm running firewalls with June 3 snapshots, but
I'm push 16k+18k pps at
Tony Sarendal said:
> When it comes to network performance most plattforms have limitations in
> packets per second before bandwidth. Please post the performance in pps
> also,
> as that is more interesting and more relevant, especially in the GigE case.
I don't see a way in iperf to get this sta
I don't know if this will help, but you might also want to look into
piloting -current's idle loop fix.
On Thursday 09 June 2005 17:25, nate wrote:
> Hello --
>
> I am testing out a couple of new firewalls running
> openbsd 3.6 (plan to upgrade to 3.7 soon), I did
> some searches to see what kind of performance I
> can expect and didn't come up with much other
> than one posting where a guy got more
Hello --
I am testing out a couple of new firewalls running
openbsd 3.6 (plan to upgrade to 3.7 soon), I did
some searches to see what kind of performance I
can expect and didn't come up with much other
than one posting where a guy got more than
800Mbit of throughput.
Currently I am testing with
8 matches
Mail list logo
