Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-11 Thread lists
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:31:57 -0500 "Adam Thompson" > > > Plus, this year it appears that Peter is co-delivering the seminar > > > with Massimiliano Stucchi from RIPE, so it will presumably cover > > > a lot of IPv6 topics as well, which are poorly represented in > > > existing materials and yet incre

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-11 Thread Adam Thompson
> -Original Message- > From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On > Behalf Of bytevolc...@safe-mail.net > Sent: April 10, 2017 19:31 > > > Plus, this year it appears that Peter is co-delivering the seminar > > with Massimiliano Stucchi from RIPE, so it will presumably c

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread Alexander Hall
On April 11, 2017 5:54:31 AM GMT+02:00, Ingo Schwarze wrote: >bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote on Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:30:35AM >+1000: > >> Another issue with the man pages is that there is extremely limited >> indexing. > >That isn't true on OpenBSD. It still is true on most Linux >distributio

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread Ingo Schwarze
bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote on Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:30:35AM +1000: > Another issue with the man pages is that there is extremely limited > indexing. That isn't true on OpenBSD. It still is true on most Linux distributions, and even on FreeBSD by default, but at least FreeBSD has an option

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Another issue with the man pages is that there is extremely limited > indexing. They are manual pages, not manual books. You are welcome to spend your time building an entire new subsystem and proving the value of your work. Go knock yourself out.

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread bytevolcano
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:10:55 -0500 Adam Thompson wrote: > You've asked almost the same question as "why does anyone need > tutorials? just read the man pages!" just at the next level up. The > answer is because the man pages aren't adequate to cover every > scenario, and not everyone can read

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread Jason Tubnor
On 8 April 2017 at 07:41, Mihai Popescu wrote: > I don;t want to offend you folks, but I'm curious and I will ask: is > this BSDCon so useful? Does it pay the efforts? > > If someone has time and knowledge to do a PF tutorial he/she can do it > and post. Do you need the Con? > > I'm traveling 170

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread Adam Thompson
On 2017-04-07 16:41, Mihai Popescu wrote: I don;t want to offend you folks, but I'm curious and I will ask: is this BSDCon so useful? Does it pay the efforts? If someone has time and knowledge to do a PF tutorial he/she can do it and post. Do you need the Con? I'm asking this having in my mind

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-09 Thread Glenn Faustino
Hi All, Here's my config I'm using on my apu2 on my home network: [apu2@apu2.domain.local:~]$ doas cat /etc/pf.conf doas (apu2@apu2.domain.local) password: # $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.54 2014/08/23 05:49:42 deraadt Exp $ # # See pf.conf(5) and /etc/examples/pf.conf # Macros ext_if =

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017-04-05, Marko Cupać wrote: > I still haven't found a way to throttle down queues to desired values > without using fixed min and max values. I haven't done very well with this either. I've had better luck with kernels built with higher HZ but haven't been really happy with it (and what I r

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread Philipp Buehler
Am 07.04.2017 18:38 schrieb Peter N. M. Hansteen: On 04/07/17 18:00, I love OpenBSD wrote: I second to more IPv6 related information. I am curious about blocking port scanning in IPv6 Web. Does pf let me put a CIDR into the named table based on offending IPv6 address and 64-bit mask? I mean so

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread bytevolcano
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:39:16 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017-04-06, > wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:44:54 + (UTC) > > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > >> On 2017-04-05, > >> wrote: > >> > I've been using a trick to emulate scheduled rules using IP > >> > tables. > >>

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread Mihai Popescu
I don;t want to offend you folks, but I'm curious and I will ask: is this BSDCon so useful? Does it pay the efforts? If someone has time and knowledge to do a PF tutorial he/she can do it and post. Do you need the Con? I'm asking this having in my mind Google Summer of (no)Code thread from misc@.

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread mabi
Dear Peter, May I suggest the following topic of interest: PF with VLAN interfaces (with LACP trunk interface behind) and CARP of course. Regards, M. Original Message Subject: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial Local Time: April 1, 2017 10:52 AM UTC Time: April 1

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017-04-06, wrote: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:44:54 + (UTC) > Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> On 2017-04-05, >> wrote: >> > I've been using a trick to emulate scheduled rules using IP >> > tables. >> >> Nice trick. Anchors are also good for this. >> >> But don't forget that active connect

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017-04-07, I love OpenBSD wrote: > I second to more IPv6 related information. > I am curious about blocking port scanning in IPv6 Web. Does pf let me put a > CIDR into the named table based on offending IPv6 address and 64-bit mask? I > mean something similar to 'overload ' option. "overloa

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
On 04/07/17 18:00, I love OpenBSD wrote: > I second to more IPv6 related information. > I am curious about blocking port scanning in IPv6 Web. Does pf let me put a > CIDR into the named table based on offending IPv6 address and 64-bit mask? I > mean something similar to 'overload ' option. Table

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread R0me0 ***
+1 Queue Prioritization and ToS ( set prio / set tos combinations ) by examples will be great 2017-04-07 13:00 GMT-03:00 I love OpenBSD : > I second to more IPv6 related information. > I am curious about blocking port scanning in IPv6 Web. Does pf let me put > a CIDR into the named table based on

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread I love OpenBSD
I second to more IPv6 related information. I am curious about blocking port scanning in IPv6 Web. Does pf let me put a CIDR into the named table based on offending IPv6 address and 64-bit mask? I mean something similar to 'overload ' option.

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
On 04/07/17 13:36, Markus Rosjat wrote: > Since not everyone can attend to this Conference will there be a > recording of this session? At previous BSDCans, talks have generally been recorded but not tutorials. So probably not. Slides likely will be available after the session has concluded. On

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread Markus Rosjat
Since not everyone can attend to this Conference will there be a recording of this session? I use pf not so much on a daily basis but I would like to get more insight too ;) And I admit I'm more the visual guy regards Markus Am 07.04.2017 um 06:25 schrieb li...@wrant.com: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-07 Thread Craig Skinner
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 07:25:58 +0300 li...@wrant.com wrote: > Thank you ALL for the hard work over the years to complement OpenBSD. Yes.

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-06 Thread lists
Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17:46:18 +0200 Marko Cupać > On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 10:52:20 +0200 > "Peter N. M. Hansteen" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I thought I'd like to give you a heads up that there will be a "PF and > > networking" tutorial at BSDCan 2017 in Ottawa this June. > > > > The session will however not

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-05 Thread Jason Tubnor
Without hijacking this thread completely, but touching on some of the elements discussed above (and I think these are great inclusions for the tutorial). We have implemented a variety of queues to manage our internet links and ikev2 VPNs tunnels to remote offices. We have also done something simi

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-05 Thread bytevolcano
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:44:54 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017-04-05, > wrote: > > I've been using a trick to emulate scheduled rules using IP > > tables. > > Nice trick. Anchors are also good for this. > > But don't forget that active connections won't be dropped unless you > al

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-05 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017-04-05, wrote: > I've been using a trick to emulate scheduled rules using IP tables. Nice trick. Anchors are also good for this. But don't forget that active connections won't be dropped unless you also flush the relevant states.

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-05 Thread bytevolcano
I've been using a trick to emulate scheduled rules using IP tables. It would be nice to have something like this covered. I have even seen it in the silliest of home router firewalls. First, create a rule with a table like so: # Schedule Table table persist # Scheduled access to HTTP pass in o

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-05 Thread Sterling Archer
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > Hi, > > I thought I'd like to give you a heads up that there will be a "PF and > networking" tutorial at BSDCan 2017 in Ottawa this June. > > The session will however not be the Nth rerun of the old one, we're > starting from scratch

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-05 Thread Marko Cupać
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 10:52:20 +0200 "Peter N. M. Hansteen" wrote: > Hi, > > I thought I'd like to give you a heads up that there will be a "PF and > networking" tutorial at BSDCan 2017 in Ottawa this June. > > The session will however not be the Nth rerun of the old one, we're > starting from scrat

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-05 Thread Mike Coddington
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 10:52:20AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > Hi, > > I thought I'd like to give you a heads up that there will be a "PF and > networking" tutorial at BSDCan 2017 in Ottawa this June. > > The session will however not be the Nth rerun of the old one, we're > starting from

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-03 Thread Simen Stavdal
Anycast with ospf and ipv6 could be a fun tutorial... /S On 2 Apr 2017 22:27, "Luke Small" wrote: > It might be a fun idea to share what a really locked down desktop system > pf.conf would look like like if you are running a chain of DNS services (or > something that would be good to tightly co

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-02 Thread Luke Small
It might be a fun idea to share what a really locked down desktop system pf.conf would look like like if you are running a chain of DNS services (or something that would be good to tightly control) like local ntpd, unbound, and dnscrypt_proxy where you have local traffic locked down as well so that

Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-01 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Hi, I thought I'd like to give you a heads up that there will be a "PF and networking" tutorial at BSDCan 2017 in Ottawa this June. The session will however not be the Nth rerun of the old one, we're starting from scratch this time, and were looking for input on what to include. Do you have ques