On Jan 29, 2008 9:20 PM, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30/01/2008, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > awesome. just discovered that gmail's spam filter is a fast learner.
> > by marking the first test emails spam, i haven't seen the other posts.
>
> I've always just clicked "Delet
On 30/01/2008, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> awesome. just discovered that gmail's spam filter is a fast learner.
> by marking the first test emails spam, i haven't seen the other posts.
I've always just clicked "Delete" instead. I don't acutally know
Gmail's spam filter algorithm, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:38:59PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski sez:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:40:06AM -0600, Denny White wrote:
>
> > Though warned not to test on the list,
> > The rascal just couldn't resist.
>
> If you mean me - thanks, Danny; I l
Yep,
On Jan 29, 2008 2:06 AM, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There once was a message to test
> Repeated unto being a pest
> While marked to ignore
> It was seen more and more
> Until other begged, "Give it a rest!"
Someone had to say it.
--
Best Regards
Edd
ht
On Jan 29, 2008 1:47 PM, Marti Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not everyone flamed you -- most of us (myself included) ignored your
> initial email(s) as a minor irritation. But count me among the
> arrogant assholes who *were* annoyed by it.
awesome. just discovered that gmail's spam filte
On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
> That's the second - and last - explaining from my side. I want to
> add, that such (over)reaction of several persons is very
> disappointing to me.
there once was a Pole without humor
uptight as if he had tumors
again he sent mail
in spite of
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:22:24PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> Please restart humord(1) before reading this list or you will continue
> to be very disappointed. (;
Well, OK - let's get over it... ;)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:38:59PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
> Just out of curiosity: what really a difference can you see between my tests
> - and this, for example, thread, whish is just about nothing ("limericks")?
> I can see at least one: I *had* to make some tests, I was in contact wit
On Jan 29, 2008 11:38 AM, Zbigniew Baniewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4. It's really a pity, that *all* (?) of you prefer to see my difficulties
> as some kind of "bad will" or "list abuse"; and nowhere could I see a
> message like: "perhaps he needs some help?". I don't want to believe, this
>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:40:06AM -0600, Denny White wrote:
> Though warned not to test on the list,
> The rascal just couldn't resist.
If you mean me - thanks, Danny; I love you too.
1. Any test messages, which I've sent, reached the list several hours (some
even more than 24) after submission
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:30:21PM +0100, Marc Balmer sez:
> Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> >Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>There once was a message to test
> >>Repeated unto being a pest
> >>While marked to ignore
> >>It wa
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:30:21PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>> Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> There once was a message to test
>>> Repeated unto being a pest
>>> While marked to ignore
>>> It was seen more and more
>>> Until other begged, "Giv
Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That has the quality to go into fortune (where we already have
> some limericks)
yes, fortune may be more appropriate. it does deserve some sort of
prominent display, though :)
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementatio
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, "Give it a rest!"
That one needs to be included in the faq somewhere, urgent
Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There once was a message to test
> Repeated unto being a pest
> While marked to ignore
> It was seen more and more
> Until other begged, "Give it a rest!"
That one needs to be included in the faq somewhere, urgently.
- P
--
Peter N. M. H
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, "Give it a rest!"
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.o
16 matches
Mail list logo
