Forgot to CC the list, my bad.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Joseph C. Bender
wrote:
> J.C. Roberts wrote:
>>
>> As for the mentioned issue of encrypting the bus data, since you've got
>> the VLAN it is feasible, but if you've got an attacker inside the
>> switches of your datacenter, then you
J.C. Roberts wrote:
As for the mentioned issue of encrypting the bus data, since you've got
the VLAN it is feasible, but if you've got an attacker inside the
switches of your datacenter, then you obviously have more important
problems.
Another scenario is that you get a compromised machine t
On 4/7/2009 9:43 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
As for the mentioned issue of encrypting the bus data, since you've got
the VLAN it is feasible, but if you've got an attacker inside the
switches of your datacenter, then you obviously have more important
problems. Also, there are a number of applications
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Steve Shockley
wrote:
> I mostly trust that nobody is sniffing my PCI bus, I'm less
> trusting when data goes over the network.
You can use a dedicated network.
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:48:52 -0500 Marco Peereboom
wrote:
> > The design involves a technology called "Express Ether" though it is
> > typically written as "ExpEther," and it is basically a way to run a
> > PCIe bus over ethernet. Though this might be the first you've heard
> > of it, ExpEther has
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:04:00 +0300 Jussi Peltola wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:23:59AM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote:
> > On 4/7/2009 9:08 AM, Declan Ingram wrote:
> >>> How does that help if you're encrypting the connection to the
> >>> ExpEther server/device? I mostly trust that nobody is
> The design involves a technology called "Express Ether" though it is
> typically written as "ExpEther," and it is basically a way to run a
> PCIe bus over ethernet. Though this might be the first you've heard of
> it, ExpEther has been in development at NEC for the last five years,
> and yes, I'm
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:23:59AM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote:
> On 4/7/2009 9:08 AM, Declan Ingram wrote:
>>> How does that help if you're encrypting the connection to the ExpEther
>>> server/device? I mostly trust that nobody is sniffing my PCI bus, I'm
>>> less trusting when data goes ove
On 4/7/2009 9:08 AM, Declan Ingram wrote:
How does that help if you're encrypting the connection to the ExpEther
server/device? I mostly trust that nobody is sniffing my PCI bus, I'm
less trusting when data goes over the network.
Just tunnel it over SSH
That's fine, but then how do I
On Tue 07/04/09 9:28 PM , Steve Shockley wrote:
On 4/6/2009 10:23 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>For
> example if your VPN or secure website is running a little slow, you
> would usually halt the machine and add a crypto accelerator, but with
> ExpEther, you just export a crypto accelerator devic
On 4/6/2009 10:23 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
For
example if your VPN or secure website is running a little slow, you
would usually halt the machine and add a crypto accelerator, but with
ExpEther, you just export a crypto accelerator device on another system
to the system that needs it and the recip
2009/4/7 J.C. Roberts :
> The design involves a technology called "Express Ether" though it is
> typically written as "ExpEther," and it is basically a way to run a
> PCIe bus over ethernet. Though this might be the first you've heard of
> it, ExpEther has been in development at NEC for the last f
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:52:28 -0500 Marco Peereboom
wrote:
> That said I can guarantee that the OpenBSD project pays more attention
> to its users then other OS'. This does not mean that the users get to
> set the road-map. When an idea is not good the author is told so,
> usually, in strong lang
13 matches
Mail list logo
