Thank you all very much for the help. I really appreciate it.
BR
--- On Wed, 2/16/11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> From: Stuart Henderson
> Subject: Re: Strange pf match
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2011, 11:39 PM
> On 2011-02-16, Henning Brauer
> wro
On 2011-02-16, Henning Brauer wrote:
> apparently you're not on tech... it's a bug and it's fixed. dunno
> wether it has been pulled to -stable yet.
Yes, and errata are published for 4.7-4.8.
> * m [2011-02-16 13:31]:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> could someone please tell me how it's possible for a rule
woult it match in that way? Do I have to
> rewrite all IPRange rules?
>
> Anyone plese. Henning?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> --- On Sat, 2/12/11, m wrote:
>
> > From: m
> > Subject: Strange pf match
> > To: misc@openbsd.org
> > Date: Saturday
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 04:27:27AM -0800, m wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>could someone please tell me how it's possible for a rule to match wrong dst
>address? Under what circumstances woult it match in that way? Do I have to
>rewrite all IPRange rules?
This is fixed in -current:
http://marc.info/?l=openb
gt; Subject: Strange pf match
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Saturday, February 12, 2011, 4:00 PM
> Hello everyone,
>
> please take a look and tell if I'm missing something or is
> this a serious bug?
>
> #tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0
> tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-t
Hello everyone,
please take a look and tell if I'm missing something or is this a serious bug?
#tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0
tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
Feb 12 15:40:18.181584 rule 704/(match) pass in on vlan2: 10.100.100.55.49747 >
10.7.13.115.25: S 1349727012:1349727012(0) wi
6 matches
Mail list logo
