Hi Eli,
> Eli K. Breen wrote:
> Have you tried simply unplugging one's network cable? (to more closely
> replicate what would happen during a hard lock or panic?) I should think
> things won't be as smooth.
Thats correct. When ifconfig down one IF, then it works and the backup
becomes master on b
On Nov 23, 2005, at 5:38 AM, Eli K. Breen wrote:
I found the problem you describe when I specifically set the
advskew on the two carp interfaces. Give it a whirl.
Give what a whirl? I do have advskew set on the carp interfaces on
the backup node. Since I want one node of the two to be pri
I found the problem you describe when I specifically set the advskew on
the two carp interfaces. Give it a whirl.
-E-
Chad M Stewart wrote:
I had tested quite a bit in 3.7 in a lab environment, never found an
issue. Now this is 3.8 in production for my business network. I just
pulled the
I had tested quite a bit in 3.7 in a lab environment, never found an
issue. Now this is 3.8 in production for my business network. I
just pulled the patch cable from the switch for the WAN NIC on the
master node. Poof the FW service switched to the backup node. I
then plugged the patch
Have you tried simply unplugging one's network cable? (to more closely
replicate what would happen during a hard lock or panic?) I should think
things won't be as smooth. Additionally, what happens if you shut the
master down in to Single-User mode?
I'm seeing a bug where if the MASTER is shutdo
On Nov 22, 2005, at 11:52 AM, Ralf Hornik Mailings wrote:
Could this be a bug in preemption? Has anyone else successfully set up
carp with preemption? My OS is now OpenBSD 3.8 RELEASE. After going to
stable, I'll be back! :-)
This past weekend I implemented a pair of 3.8 (right of CD) carp/pf
Hi list,
I found out something new.
> Ralf Hornik Mailings schrieb:
> However, the advskew of carp1 on the master side keeps being zero,
> allthough showing itself as BACKUP. Should ifconfig show advskew 240 then?
tcpdump tells me although preemtion enabled an advskew of 0! After I look
at ifcon
Hi Nick,
> Nick Holland wrote:
> To the top of google we go! :)
Great! :-)
> are all the interfaces really in the carp group?
Yes, I believe, because carp works if I shut down the Box, or something...
> are the interfaces accurately and reliably detecting the cable-unplug?
> Might some NICs (o
Jon Hart wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:31:15PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
>> I'd have prefered that a more experienced person answer this one, but
>> they don't seem to have, so be forewarned: everything I say here might
>> be wrong. However, through the glory of mail lists, if I say somethi
* Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-11 03:34]:
> not really, if you understand the modular approach here.
>
> > My config:
> ...
>
> > Can anybody reproduce it, and has a solution for this problem?
> > Any help would be very nice! :-)
>
> Look at the pieces here:
> * CARP gives you redunancy on
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:31:15PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> I'd have prefered that a more experienced person answer this one, but
> they don't seem to have, so be forewarned: everything I say here might
> be wrong. However, through the glory of mail lists, if I say something
> wrong, fifty peo
I'd have prefered that a more experienced person answer this one, but
they don't seem to have, so be forewarned: everything I say here might
be wrong. However, through the glory of mail lists, if I say something
wrong, fifty people will jump all over me, and Google will put it at the
top of the li
Dear list,
I set up two OpenBSD 3.7 -stable firewalls using carp. Everything works
except preemption.
When only one interface on the master side fails (pull the Cable) the
regarding carp0 interface on the backup side becomes master. But not
carp1.
I waited some minutes, but carp1 keeps being bac
13 matches
Mail list logo
