Re: Spamd(8) may be subject to DOS in grey-trapping mode

2008-10-09 Thread Mikhail Boev (TRIC)
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: "Michael Boev (TRIC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I suspected of, and later verified a case, in which spamd in grey-trapping mode may be forced to a DOS. I'd say rather that you have found a possible conflict between greytrapping and milter-sender. I see the backs

Re: Spamd(8) may be subject to DOS in grey-trapping mode

2008-10-08 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
"Michael Boev (TRIC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I suspected of, and later verified a case, in which spamd in > grey-trapping mode may be forced to a DOS. I'd say rather that you have found a possible conflict between greytrapping and milter-sender. I see the backscatter bounces for enough me

Re: Spamd(8) may be subject to DOS in grey-trapping mode

2008-10-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-10-08, Michael Boev (TRIC) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To whom it may concern > > I suspected of, and later verified a case, in which spamd in > grey-trapping mode may be forced to a DOS. > > I use exactly this configuration, so I am concerned too. In this case I > am a FreeBSD user with

Spamd(8) may be subject to DOS in grey-trapping mode

2008-10-08 Thread Michael Boev (TRIC)
Hi, To whom it may concern I suspected of, and later verified a case, in which spamd in grey-trapping mode may be forced to a DOS. I use exactly this configuration, so I am concerned too. In this case I am a FreeBSD user with a fresh spamd-4.1.2 installed through ports(7). Conditions: 1) A