On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 08:29:17PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
> On 14/06/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:31:49AM -0700, John Draper wrote:
> > > Mike Spenard wrote:
> > > >What are some thoughts on purposely getting a spam trap email
> > > >address a
tony sarendal wrote:
> On 14/06/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:31:49AM -0700, John Draper wrote:
>>> Mike Spenard wrote:
>>>
What are some thoughts on purposely getting a spam trap email
address acquired by spammers and the best way to do so
On 14/06/06, Spruell, Darren-Perot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > So if people route specific unused email addresses to spam traps,
> > what do they actually do with the received emails to reduce spam
> > to legitimate addresses ?
>
> If you're not making the connection,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So if people route specific unused email addresses to spam traps,
> what do they actually do with the received emails to reduce spam
> to legitimate addresses ?
If you're not making the connection, you don't understand how spamd(8)
works.
Your MX receives mail for your
On 14/06/06, Spruell, Darren-Perot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > we used to have 'spammers ? spam this [EMAIL PROTECTED]' at the
> > > bottom of each page so that crawlers would spam it. also, we had a
> > > few systems accounts, not supposed to receive mail, act as s
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > we used to have 'spammers ? spam this [EMAIL PROTECTED]' at the
> > bottom of each page so that crawlers would spam it. also, we had a
> > few systems accounts, not supposed to receive mail, act as spam
> > traps which proved to be quite efficient.
> >
> >
> So what do
On 14/06/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:31:49AM -0700, John Draper wrote:
> > Mike Spenard wrote:
> >
> > >What are some thoughts on purposely getting a spam trap email
> > >address acquired by spammers and the best way to do so.
> >
> > It is hard t
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:31:49AM -0700, John Draper wrote:
> Mike Spenard wrote:
>
> >What are some thoughts on purposely getting a spam trap email
> >address acquired by spammers and the best way to do so.
>
> It is hard to do initially, unless you want to spend a lot of time
> signing up for
Mike Spenard wrote:
What are some thoughts on purposely getting a spam trap email
address acquired by spammers and the best way to do so.
It is hard to do initially, unless you want to spend a lot of time
signing up for things over the web... In my case, I have a very
good spam trap. But I
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:42:02PM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote:
> Maybe you're really looking for something like spamd:
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/
>
> Much more effective than a trap e-mail address in my opinion?
Spamd can be configured to use a 'trap' e-mail address... See under
'GRAYTRAP
Maybe you're really looking for something like spamd:
http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/
Much more effective than a trap e-mail address in my opinion?
Kian
On 6/1/06, Mike Spenard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What are some thoughts on purposely getting a spam trap email
> address acquired by spamm
What are some thoughts on purposely getting a spam trap email
address acquired by spammers and the best way to do so.
i.e. Is it best to use only a defunct address for trapping, or will
intentionally getting a new trap address spammed only increase
ones spam input and be detrimental overall. I w
12 matches
Mail list logo
