Re: Slow Sparc Ultra 5

2005-09-21 Thread Tim Kornau
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 at 11:14 +1000, BadMagic wrote: > Hello, > > I installed OpenBSD 3.7 (Sparc64) on my Ultra 5 and it's performance is not what I'd expected. I'd recently had Solaris on there (using CDE) and it ran quite quickly but with OpenBSD, when I do an 'ls -la', it takes forever for the sc

Re: Slow Sparc Ultra 5

2005-09-18 Thread Eric Huiban
badmagic a icrit : No, that's not it. I just clipped the wrong part of my dmesg. It's running under GENERIC kernel. pciide0 at pci1 dev 3 function 0 vendor 0x1095 product 0x0646 rev 0x03: DMA, channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI pciide0: using ivec 1820 for

Re: Slow Sparc Ultra 5

2005-09-18 Thread Steve Murdoch
badmagic wrote: No, that's not it. I just clipped the wrong part of my dmesg. It's running under GENERIC kernel. Bryan Irvine wrote: Maybe because you are using the RAMDISK kernel? Try switching to GENERIC, and see if that works better. --Bryan On 9/15/05, BadMagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: Slow Sparc Ultra 5

2005-09-18 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
Maybe you can try compiling a 3.8 kernel and see how that works. Jasper On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:49:04 +1000 badmagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, that's not it. I just clipped the wrong part of my dmesg. > It's running under GENERIC kernel. > > > > Bryan Irvine wrote: > > >Maybe because

Re: Slow Sparc Ultra 5

2005-09-18 Thread badmagic
No, that's not it. I just clipped the wrong part of my dmesg. It's running under GENERIC kernel. Bryan Irvine wrote: Maybe because you are using the RAMDISK kernel? Try switching to GENERIC, and see if that works better. --Bryan On 9/15/05, BadMagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello,

Re: Slow Sparc Ultra 5

2005-09-18 Thread badmagic
Thank you for that. I never noticed. I haven't tried it yet but I'm sure that's it. Funny, I've installed OpenBSD countless number of times on x86 machines and never seen it use the ramdisk kernel by default. I'm new to OpenBSD on Sparc64 but there are obviously differences to watch out for. On

Re: Slow Sparc Ultra 5

2005-09-16 Thread Bryan Irvine
Maybe because you are using the RAMDISK kernel? Try switching to GENERIC, and see if that works better. --Bryan On 9/15/05, BadMagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I installed OpenBSD 3.7 (Sparc64) on my Ultra 5 and it's performance is not > what I'd expected. I'd recently had Solaris

Re: Slow Sparc Ultra 5

2005-09-16 Thread Alexander Schrijver
On 9/16/05, BadMagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I installed OpenBSD 3.7 (Sparc64) on my Ultra 5 and it's performance is not > what I'd expected. I'd recently had Solaris on there (using CDE) and it ran > quite quickly but with OpenBSD, when I do an 'ls -la', it takes forever for >

Slow Sparc Ultra 5

2005-09-15 Thread BadMagic
Hello, I installed OpenBSD 3.7 (Sparc64) on my Ultra 5 and it's performance is not what I'd expected. I'd recently had Solaris on there (using CDE) and it ran quite quickly but with OpenBSD, when I do an 'ls -la', it takes forever for the screen to scroll through the list and try it via ssh! Sl