http://www.jnode.org/ has been around for a while
and if you search sf.net for "+java +operating +system"
http://sourceforge.net/search/?words=%2Bjava+%2Bos&type_of_search=soft&pmode=0&words=%2Bjava+%2Boperating+%2Bsystem&Search=Search
you get 86 results.
So the C# version was bound to follow. A
> Are you sure you used the STL?
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/kernel/KMcode.mspx
>
> Read the section about "Libraries":
>
> "Although much of the Standard Template Library is implemented as source
> code in headers, it occasionally uses library functions or other
> features that
Die Gestalt wrote:
> I wrote several drivers in Windows NT using C++/STL/Boost and they had
> excellent performances and reliability.
>
>
Are you sure you used the STL?
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/kernel/KMcode.mspx
Read the section about "Libraries":
"Although much of the Standard T
"Vikas N Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a kernel being written in Lisp called Movitz (
> http://common-lisp.net/project/movitz/) and there was one in Python
> as well that I saw a few years ago but I forget the name (it started
> with U...)
Unununium.org
--
Jonathan
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Gilles Chehade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mayuresh Kathe a icrit :
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> >> > However having chosen C# is in my opinion not optimal. C# is very
> >> > limited when it comes to
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:29 AM, bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Steve Shockley <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > > What's next? an OS in java and php?
> > Are you living in 2001? It should be in Ruby on Rails.
> No, the OS should be
Mayuresh Kathe a icrit :
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > However having chosen C# is in my opinion not optimal. C# is very
>> > limited when it comes to generic and meta-programming.
>>
>> What's next? an OS in java and php?
>>
>
> Marc
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > What's next? an OS in java and php?
>
> Are you living in 2001? It should be in Ruby on Rails.
No, the OS should be written in silverlight.
--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://w
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However having chosen C# is in my opinion not optimal. C# is very
> > limited when it comes to generic and meta-programming.
>
> What's next? an OS in java and php?
Marco, it would be better for you if you make infor
Marco Peereboom wrote:
What's next? an OS in java and php?
Are you living in 2001? It should be in Ruby on Rails.
Can't wait to see it's incredible success at being an OS.
Ever wondered why your cell phone OS sucks?
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 09:37:13AM -0600, Erik Harmon wrote:
> What's next? an OS in java and php?
>
>There's been a Java OS in development for a while.
>
>http://www.jnod
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 06:56:24AM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:19:03PM +0100, Die Gestalt wrote:
> > Having a kernel with managed code is not necessarily idiotic (although
> > I think in most cases smart pointers do the job better).
>
> Love the marketing lingo "mana
> What's next? an OS in java and php?
There's been a Java OS in development for a while.
http://www.jnode.org/
Erik
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:06:26PM +0100, Die Gestalt wrote:
> Sorry my answer was perhaps a bit aggressive. I tend to get a bit...
> unsettled as I hear very often "C++ is crap and a nonsense in the
> kernel" from people who never seriously studied the language.
I have studied it and used it on
Sorry my answer was perhaps a bit aggressive. I tend to get a bit...
unsettled as I hear very often "C++ is crap and a nonsense in the
kernel" from people who never seriously studied the language.
I wrote several drivers in Windows NT using C++/STL/Boost and they had
excellent performances and re
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 01:16:16PM +0100, Die Gestalt wrote:
> I don't think it is relevant or even polite to question one's
> abilities when discussing technical matters.
>
> If you have a point to make, please proceed.
You state an opinion without backing it up by referring to either
existing
Perpetual motion machines?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Die Gestalt
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 6:16 AM
> To: Otto Moerbeek
> Cc: misc
> Subject: Re: Singularity OS
>
> I don't think it is rel
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:19:03PM +0100, Die Gestalt wrote:
> Having a kernel with managed code is not necessarily idiotic (although
> I think in most cases smart pointers do the job better).
Love the marketing lingo "managed code". I am sure we can move some
boxes with that term.
>
> However
Point is that C++ is retarded.
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 01:16:16PM +0100, Die Gestalt wrote:
> I don't think it is relevant or even polite to question one's
> abilities when discussing technical matters.
>
> If you have a point to make, please proceed.
>
> > Have you ever been involved in OS des
I don't think it is relevant or even polite to question one's
abilities when discussing technical matters.
If you have a point to make, please proceed.
> Have you ever been involved in OS design and implementation? And I do
> not mean academic exercises, but a real world project producing actu
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:19:03PM +0100, Die Gestalt wrote:
> Having a kernel with managed code is not necessarily idiotic (although
> I think in most cases smart pointers do the job better).
>
> However having chosen C# is in my opinion not optimal. C# is very
> limited when it comes to generic
Having a kernel with managed code is not necessarily idiotic (although
I think in most cases smart pointers do the job better).
However having chosen C# is in my opinion not optimal. C# is very
limited when it comes to generic and meta-programming.
I think "modern-styled" C++ (ie template intensi
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 22:27:49 +, Andris wrote:
>I wonder if anyone actually took a look to the code before opening
>his/her mouth.
>
>Note that I don't trust Microsoft either, but giving that Singularity
>is not planned to be a successor to Windows, but a research
>experiment, makes me think it
I wonder if anyone actually took a look to the code before opening
his/her mouth.
Note that I don't trust Microsoft either, but giving that Singularity
is not planned to be a successor to Windows, but a research
experiment, makes me think it _can_ be good.
The OS is written in Managed code and designed by managers :)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Henry Sieff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> "The OS is coded in an extension of C# - rather than more simple C or
> C++ - to avoid the flaws of today's operating systems, such as their
> susceptibility
Thank God someone is writing an OS with dependability and security in mind.
Erik
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Adrian Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello chaps :)
>
> I just saw this on the net about a new OS from M$ called Singularity.
> What
> do you think of it thus far?
>
>
> http:
"The OS is coded in an extension of C# - rather than more simple C or
C++ - to avoid the flaws of today's operating systems, such as their
susceptibility to buffer overruns from worms or viruses."
Hahahahahahahahahaha!
I needed that laugh.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Adrian Fisher <[EMA
Hello chaps :)
I just saw this on the net about a new OS from M$ called Singularity. What
do you think of it thus far?
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/174267/microsoft-releases-robust-new-operating-system.html
28 matches
Mail list logo
