Re: Samba-3.0.25a and ext2-partitions

2007-08-12 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
Yes, mounting SMB-share. smb-log yields NT_NO_SUCH_FILE as soon as I try to 'ls' this mounted share. The strange thing is what everything worked fine with older Samba (I think it was older 3.x). I have not changed smb.conf for a while. On 12 aug 2007, at 21.44, Joachim Schipper wrote: On

Re: Samba-3.0.25a and ext2-partitions

2007-08-12 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Via SAMBA, I suppose (you're also doing NFS, I see)? Samba has a silly amount of options, most of them dictated by the idiocy^H^Hsyncracies of Microsoft networking. However, Unix file permissions are not always irrelevant and possibly worth checking

Re: Samba-3.0.25a and ext2-partitions

2007-08-12 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:20:17PM +0200, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: > Hello! > This is a very odd problem and I have not found any answers on the net. > Hope some one can give a hint. > > OpenBSD-machine (4.1-current some how) with Samba-3.0.25a serving 3 > shares: > NAS,MP3 and OpenBSD. > NAS an

Samba-3.0.25a and ext2-partitions

2007-08-12 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
Hello! This is a very odd problem and I have not found any answers on the net. Hope some one can give a hint. OpenBSD-machine (4.1-current some how) with Samba-3.0.25a serving 3 shares: NAS,MP3 and OpenBSD. NAS and MP3 are ext2fs-paritions on the disk, OpenBSD is ffs-partition. Setup for those s