Leroy,
You can use any mirror as long as the mirror contains the patches
for your version and architecture,
mirrors should have identical content (once they are all synced ) ...
you can change PKG_PATH at anytime (except when installing
something )
I hope this helps
On 22 February 2018 at 2
So what can you do if the installurl file dose not mach the mirror site
that you downloaded the iso from. In my case I download it from New York
however I have Sonic which is San Francisco.
On Feb 22, 2018 7:36 AM, "Marcus MERIGHI" wrote:
> t...@equalit.ie (tomr), 2018.02.22 (Thu) 12:35 (CET):
t...@equalit.ie (tomr), 2018.02.22 (Thu) 12:35 (CET):
> On 02/21/18 04:39, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:23:05 +0200
> >
> >
> >> Isn't the same true when I download file sets from any mirror? After
> >> all I download SHA256.sig abd file sets from mirror, how can I trust
> >>
On 02/21/18 04:39, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:23:05 +0200
>
>
>> Isn't the same true when I download file sets from any mirror? After
>> all I download SHA256.sig abd file sets from mirror, how can I trust
>> it?
>
> I am not a developer but my take is that they do not want
m8il1i...@gmail.com (Kevin Chadwick), 2018.02.21 (Wed) 19:07 (CET):
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:10:30 +0100
>
>
> > I know this is a little bit farfetched, pardon my ignorence, but
> > OpenBSD seeems vulnerable on first installation. In case of DNS
> > poisoning, what can stop a virus from forwardin
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:10 AM, Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
> I know this is a little bit farfetched, pardon my ignorence, but
> OpenBSD seeems vulnerable on first installation. In case of DNS
> poisoning, what can stop a virus from forwarding the installer to a
> false SHA256.sig and false reposito
>On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:45:01 +0100
>Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
>> > I download SHA256.sig abd file sets from mirror, how can I trust it?
>>
>> You run a trusted signify binary, which was not obtained from the
>> mirror but is part of your existing install, to check the signature
>> on SHA256.sig.
On 2018-02-21, Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:45:01 +0100
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
>> > I download SHA256.sig abd file sets from mirror, how can I trust it?
>>
>> You run a trusted signify binary, which was not obtained from the
>> mirror but is part of your existing install
>If someone is able to provide a fake ISO, he will also provide fake
>SHA256.sig and/or fake public key on the ISO. So there is no gain to
>provide such material as people will think "it is safe" whereas it is
>not.
that is true.
however, the real reason it isn't on the media is that internal
sig
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:10:30 +0100
> I know this is a little bit farfetched, pardon my ignorence, but
> OpenBSD seeems vulnerable on first installation. In case of DNS
> poisoning, what can stop a virus from forwarding the installer to a
> false SHA256.sig and false repository? My guess would be
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:10:30AM +0100, Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
>
> I know this is a little bit farfetched, pardon my ignorence, but
> OpenBSD seeems vulnerable on first installation. In case of DNS
> poisoning, what can stop a virus from forwarding the installer to a
> false SHA256.sig and fal
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:45:01 +0100
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > I download SHA256.sig abd file sets from mirror, how can I trust it?
>
> You run a trusted signify binary, which was not obtained from the
> mirror but is part of your existing install, to check the signature
> on SHA256.sig.
I know
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:23:05PM +0200, mazocomp wrote:
> Isn't the same true when I download file sets from any mirror?
No.
> After all
> I download SHA256.sig abd file sets from mirror, how can I trust it?
You run a trusted signify binary, which was not obtained from the mirror
but is part o
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:23:05 +0200
> Isn't the same true when I download file sets from any mirror? After
> all I download SHA256.sig abd file sets from mirror, how can I trust
> it?
I am not a developer but my take is that they do not want to tell you it
is verified if you have been given a CD
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:59:08PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:56:06PM +0100, Nicolas Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am finally getting around to upgrading 6.1->6.2. When I try to install
> > from CD using the install62.iso image, the install script complains that it
Sorry, I of course meant to say it‘s *not* on it.
> Am 20.02.2018 um 12:56 schrieb Nicolas Schmidt :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am finally getting around to upgrading 6.1->6.2. When I try to install from
> CD using the install62.iso image, the install script complains that it can't
> find SHA256.sig (indee
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:56:06PM +0100, Nicolas Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am finally getting around to upgrading 6.1->6.2. When I try to install from
> CD using the install62.iso image, the install script complains that it can't
> find SHA256.sig (indeed, it's on it).
>
> Is that supposed to
Hi,
I am finally getting around to upgrading 6.1->6.2. When I try to install from
CD using the install62.iso image, the install script complains that it can't
find SHA256.sig (indeed, it's on it).
Is that supposed to happen?
Best,
Nicolas A. Schmidt
18 matches
Mail list logo
