> "base" and "x" may be built at different times.
> if that happens you might get the failure on the x* checksums.
> just the way it is atm.
>
> - Robert
>
Hmm, I got the feeling that SHA256 will hold the checksums for the
existent files in that directory, plus the fact that files are used to
gene
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:01:28 +0200
"Mihai Popescu B.S." wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have downloaded the 4-Nov-2009 snapshot from ftp.openbsd.org.
> Running the `cksum -a sha256 -c SHA256` against .iso file I got the OK
> result. After CD burning I run again the command agains files on the
> CD - all th
Hello,
I have downloaded the 4-Nov-2009 snapshot from ftp.openbsd.org.
Running the `cksum -a sha256 -c SHA256` against .iso file I got the OK
result. After CD burning I run again the command agains files on the
CD - all the x*.tgz checksums are reported as FAILED. I thought it's
the damn burner fa
3 matches
Mail list logo
