: Freitag, 28. September 2012 13:45
> An: misc@openbsd.org
> Cc: Christoph Leser
> Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 05:51:42PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 2012/09/25 18:24, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Tue
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 05:51:42PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012/09/25 18:24, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:11:19AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > On 2012-09-25, Christoph Leser wrote:
> > > > Thank you for this hint.
> > > > I indeed have ike.c r=1.76.
On 2012/09/25 18:24, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:11:19AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 2012-09-25, Christoph Leser wrote:
> > > Thank you for this hint.
> > > I indeed have ike.c r=1.76.
> >
> > So why did you say you were running 5.2?
>
> The art of problem repo
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:11:19AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-09-25, Christoph Leser wrote:
> > Thank you for this hint.
> > I indeed have ike.c r=1.76.
>
> So why did you say you were running 5.2?
The art of problem reporting is much underappreciated, sadly.
-Otto
On 2012-09-25, Christoph Leser wrote:
> Thank you for this hint.
> I indeed have ike.c r=1.76.
So why did you say you were running 5.2?
istoph Leser
> Cc: Stuart Henderson; misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 06:57:26PM +, Christoph Leser wrote:
>
> > Thanks for clarification.
> >
> > I disabled NAT-T with isakmpd -K -T.
> >
>
ith_tag=MAIN
-Otto
>
> Regards
>
> > -Urspr??ngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Stuart Henderson [mailto:s...@spacehopper.org]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 24. September 2012 16:41
> > An: Christoph Leser
> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> > Betreff: Re: Router
to:s...@spacehopper.org]
> Gesendet: Montag, 24. September 2012 16:41
> An: Christoph Leser
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
>
> On 2012/09/24 13:24, Christoph Leser wrote:
> > It seems that the patch from Stuart Henderson, propose
On 2012/09/24 13:24, Christoph Leser wrote:
> It seems that the patch from Stuart Henderson, proposed on Aug.4 2012
> on tech@ has not made it into –current yet.
I only forwarded it, the patch is from hshoexer. Also it is only a partial
diff, not suitable to be committed, the encap mode value nee
Stuart Henderson wrote:
List: openbsd-misc<http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&r=1&w=2>
Subject: Re: Router project on OpenBSD
questions<http://marc.info/?t=13303717306&r=1&w=2>
From: Stuart Henderson <http://marc.info/?a=10397134052&r=1&
Henderson [mailto:s...@spacehopper.org]
Gesendet: Samstag, 22. September 2012 16:52
An: Christoph Leser; misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
Search the archives for the cisco nat-t problem, I sent a mail with more
details and I think there was a patch with it
t: openbsd-misc<http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&r=1&w=2>
>Subject:Re: Router project on OpenBSD
>questions<http://marc.info/?t=13303717306&r=1&w=2>
>From: Stuart Henderson org><http://marc.info/?a=10397134052&r=1&w=2>
&
On Feb 28, 2012, Stuart Henderson wrote:
List: openbsd-misc<http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&r=1&w=2>
Subject: Re: Router project on OpenBSD
questions<http://marc.info/?t=13303717306&r=1&w=2>
From: Stuart Henderson <http://marc.info/?a=1039713405
On 29 February 2012 14:15, Anonymous Remailer (austria)
wrote:
> Brauer spewed:
>
>> * Patrick Lamaiziere [2012-02-29 13:12]:
>> > I don't think.
>>
>> it is very tempting to comment on that :)
>>
>> > As far I can see here with a rate of 50K packets through the system, it
>> > already spents 50%
Brauer spewed:
> * Patrick Lamaiziere [2012-02-29 13:12]:
> > I don't think.
>
> it is very tempting to comment on that :)
>
> > As far I can see here with a rate of 50K packets through the system, it
> > already spents 50% in interrupt.
>
> oh, really! that applies to each and every box and u
* Patrick Lamaiziere [2012-02-29 13:12]:
> I don't think.
it is very tempting to comment on that :)
> As far I can see here with a rate of 50K packets through the system, it
> already spents 50% in interrupt.
oh, really! that applies to each and every box and usage scenario on
the planet of cou
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote:
> Le Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:13:30 +0100,
> Peter Hessler a icrit :
>
> Hello,
>
>> On 2012 Feb 29 (Wed) at 11:54:13 +0100 (+0100), Patrick Lamaiziere
>> wrote: :OpenBSD is not perfect too, it would be nice that pflow
>> handles ipv6
>>
>> pf
Le Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:13:30 +0100,
Peter Hessler a icrit :
Hello,
> On 2012 Feb 29 (Wed) at 11:54:13 +0100 (+0100), Patrick Lamaiziere
> wrote: :OpenBSD is not perfect too, it would be nice that pflow
> handles ipv6
>
> pflow now handles ipv6 (in 5.1)
That's cool! Thanks.
> :and the support
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:10:27PM +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:05 -0300,
> "Christiano F. Haesbaert" a icrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> > With a decent hardware, I think you can reach 1mpps (that's million
> > packets per second).
>
> I don't think.
>
> As far I can see
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote:
> Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:05 -0300,
> "Christiano F. Haesbaert" a icrit :
>
> Hello,
>
>> With a decent hardware, I think you can reach 1mpps (that's million
>> packets per second).
>
> I don't think.
>
> As far I can see here with a ra
On 2012 Feb 29 (Wed) at 11:54:13 +0100 (+0100), Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
:OpenBSD is not perfect too, it would be nice that pflow handles ipv6
pflow now handles ipv6 (in 5.1)
:and the support of one year is a bit short. But nothing is perfect.
If you need support for longer than a year, you wil
Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:05 -0300,
"Christiano F. Haesbaert" a icrit :
Hello,
> With a decent hardware, I think you can reach 1mpps (that's million
> packets per second).
I don't think.
As far I can see here with a rate of 50K packets through the system, it
already spents 50% in interrupt.
Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:38:45 +,
Kaya Saman a icrit :
Hello,
> I have currently only used OpenBSD as a test vector setup on
> VirtualBox and 2x Sun Fire V240's as a DNS server (master/slave)
> using Bind9. So basically in short am an OpenBSD newbee :-)
>
>
> Ok so here goes;
>
> I've been
On 2012-02-28, Kaya Saman wrote:
> I was planning on getting a 2901 with VDSL2/ADSL2/2+ Annex M card and 8
> port Gb switch card. But after careful consideration I decided against
> it as it would issue the same problems for me and be more expensive then
> going down the OpenBSD route as discus
On 02/28/2012 01:57 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I also would like to know if anyone knows of any ADSL2+ Annex M standard
PCI (/x/) based modem card that I can use to connect to my ISP with
instead of using an external device?
So far in my search I came across this:
http://linitx.com/viewcategor
>> I also would like to know if anyone knows of any ADSL2+ Annex M standard
>> PCI (/x/) based modem card that I can use to connect to my ISP with
>> instead of using an external device?
>>
>> So far in my search I came across this:
>>
>> http://linitx.com/viewcategory.php?catid=47
This is basical
With this though I'm betting that a Core2Quad Q8400s CPU (which I currently
run on a FreeBSD based Mini-NAS mainframe) will be more powerful then any
Cisco SMB based router? - I can see it being more powerful then my 8xx or
18xx series in anycase!
I don't know cisco, it's all about how much data
On 27 February 2012 17:12, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>
> So I would like to build a router out of a Quad Core Xeon system. I've
> selected the hardware for it already and the software barring the base OS.
>
>
>> You want the highest cache and highest frequency cpu you can find.
>> MP will not help you w
So I would like to build a router out of a Quad Core Xeon system. I've
selected the hardware for it already and the software barring the base OS.
You want the highest cache and highest frequency cpu you can find.
MP will not help you with routing performance at all.
Something like this:
h
Good luck
Many thanks Christiano for such a quick and comprehensive response :-)
Regards,
Kaya
On 27 February 2012 16:38, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is my first posting here :-)
>
>
> I have currently only used OpenBSD as a test vector setup on VirtualBox
> and 2x Sun Fire V240's as a DNS server (master/slave) using Bind9. So
> basically in short am an OpenBSD newbee :-)
>
>
> Ok so h
Hi,
this is my first posting here :-)
I have currently only used OpenBSD as a test vector setup on VirtualBox
and 2x Sun Fire V240's as a DNS server (master/slave) using Bind9. So
basically in short am an OpenBSD newbee :-)
Ok so here goes;
I've been using FreeBSD for around 3+ years now an
32 matches
Mail list logo
