Re: Reverse package process

2006-01-14 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Marc Espie wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:04:47PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Men, Thanks! How could I have overlook that one! I deserved to be called the moron of the day big time! That was really easy too! Shame on me for this one! Thanks for the cue! Well, it's a fairly recent fea

Re: Reverse package process

2006-01-14 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:04:47PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > Men, > > Thanks! How could I have overlook that one! I deserved to be called the > moron of the day big time! > > That was really easy too! > > Shame on me for this one! > > Thanks for the cue! Well, it's a fairly recent featur

Re: Reverse package process

2006-01-13 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Tobias Ulmer wrote: Hi Daniel, there is even an example in the pkg_create manpage ;) Tobias Men, Thanks! How could I have overlook that one! I deserved to be called the moron of the day big time! That was really easy too! Shame on me for this one! Thanks for the cue! Daniel

Re: Reverse package process

2006-01-13 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 05:33:09PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > I have kind of a very stupid question, but I am also a but stuck. > > I have a server that have a package install on it, but I do not have the > .tgz file anymore to redo the install of that same package. > > I can't rebuilt that

Re: Reverse package process

2006-01-13 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 05:33:09PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > I have kind of a very stupid question, but I am also a but stuck. > > I have a server that have a package install on it, but I do not have the > .tgz file anymore to redo the install of that same package. > > I can't rebuilt that

Reverse package process

2006-01-13 Thread Daniel Ouellet
I have kind of a very stupid question, but I am also a but stuck. I have a server that have a package install on it, but I do not have the .tgz file anymore to redo the install of that same package. I can't rebuilt that package now for many reason, but if I have to, it could be done, but with