On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:45 AM, John D. Verne wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:28:24AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > > On 2014-04-28, sven falempin wrote:
> > >> Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:28:24AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > On 2014-04-28, sven falempin wrote:
> >> Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i have
> >> to each time
> >
> > configure things for unbound-
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-04-28, sven falempin wrote:
>> Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i have
>> to each time
>
> configure things for unbound-control, then you can do
> "unbond-control local_data somehost.exaple.com A 19
On 2014-04-28, sven falempin wrote:
> Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i have
> to each time
configure things for unbound-control, then you can do
"unbond-control local_data somehost.exaple.com A 192.0.2.1".
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:53, sven falempin wrote:
> Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i have
> to each time, so to resolve the LAN clients hostnames i would
> need to
> - trigger a script when a lease is given (mostly depends the backend
> of the dhcp server)
> -
Dear misc readers,
Currently i am using dnsmasq because it inserts in the dns cache the
hostname sended to the dhcp server it provides.
It's neat, and well done by dnsmasq.
But it is not in base, moreover DNSSEC support is relying on some new
crypto lib, and some features ( static route did crea
6 matches
Mail list logo
