http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.ports/47730 - it would want updating
as well as fixing.
Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2012-05-25, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>> The question is, is there an interest in developing relevant ports? Is
>> someone working on this?
>
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2012-05-25, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>> The question is, is there an interest in developing relevant ports? Is
>> someone working on this?
>
> There are searchable mailing list archives, you know...
>
A quick search showed nothing but to be honest I didn't try hard
On 2012-05-25, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> The question is, is there an interest in developing relevant ports? Is
> someone working on this?
There are searchable mailing list archives, you know...
On 2012-05-25, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> Henning Brauer writes:
>
>> * Kostas Zorbadelos [2012-05-25 10:06]:
>>> from all relevant discussions I have seen it seems that BIND in base
>>> will not be updated to a newer version and unbound has a good chance to
>>> be the replacement. The thing is,
On 2012-05-25 15:33, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
Yes, I have understood that. The question remains: what do you think of
ports for recent BIND versions?
I am running a hand-compiled BIND 9.9 right now for the DNS64 feature.
I'd like to have an up to date port. I don't one to contribute, so I
shu
Simon Perreault writes:
> Unbound is replacing BIND in OpenBSD for increased betterness. Stay tuned...
>
Yes, I have understood that. The question remains: what do you think of
ports for recent BIND versions?
I am trying to make a case for OpenBSD in a demanding resolving setup of
a conservative
On 2012-05-25 15:14, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
filter--on-v4 (9.7+) (needed now)
purely out of curiosity: why?
Crude workaround for increased levels of IPv6 brokeness in our networks
(aka CPE with broken firmware). Needed until the proper solution is
given.
Interesting, thanks.
In any
Simon Perreault writes:
> Le 12-05-25 06:24, Kostas Zorbadelos a icrit :
>> Henning Brauer writes:
>>
>>> * Kostas Zorbadelos [2012-05-25 10:06]:
from all relevant discussions I have seen it seems that BIND in base
will not be updated to a newer version and unbound has a good chance t
Le 12-05-25 06:24, Kostas Zorbadelos a icrit :
Henning Brauer writes:
* Kostas Zorbadelos [2012-05-25 10:06]:
from all relevant discussions I have seen it seems that BIND in base
will not be updated to a newer version and unbound has a good chance to
be the replacement. The thing is, we need
Henning Brauer writes:
> * Kostas Zorbadelos [2012-05-25 10:06]:
>> from all relevant discussions I have seen it seems that BIND in base
>> will not be updated to a newer version and unbound has a good chance to
>> be the replacement. The thing is, we need a newer version of BIND for
>> resolvin
* Kostas Zorbadelos [2012-05-25 10:06]:
> from all relevant discussions I have seen it seems that BIND in base
> will not be updated to a newer version and unbound has a good chance to
> be the replacement. The thing is, we need a newer version of BIND for
> resolving (at least 9.7, preferably 9.8
Hello,
from all relevant discussions I have seen it seems that BIND in base
will not be updated to a newer version and unbound has a good chance to
be the replacement. The thing is, we need a newer version of BIND for
resolving (at least 9.7, preferably 9.8 or in the future 9.9).
The question is,
12 matches
Mail list logo
