On 07/31/2012 12:39 AM, thus Stuart Henderson spake:
On 2012-07-30, Bernd wrote:
Hi,
is this proc.c privsep reorganization issue thing in relayd still a
problem?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=133293448804527
Best,
Bernd
Yes.
Thanks for that information. I'll monitor CVS changes t
On 2012-07-30, Bernd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is this proc.c privsep reorganization issue thing in relayd still a
> problem?
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=133293448804527
>
> Best,
>
> Bernd
>
>
Yes.
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:58:45 +0200
Schmurfy wrote:
> So there really is something broken in the relayd shipped with OpenBSD 5.0
> at least for transparent mode.
I use relayd at securelevel 2 in some cases which works for relaying to
or on a single server. I've found relayd on 5.1 now exits due to
Hi List,
Am 03.05.2012 09:47, schrieb Sebastian Benoit:
>> Martin Bley(martin.b...@bvl.bund.de) on 2012.05.03 08:49:41 +0200:
>> I think this is still broken in 5.1?
>
> Yes, 5.1 was already finished at the end of march. I also dont think
> anything changed in -current since then.
>
>> Any hints h
first of all, sorry for the sender reply (to Sebastian)
Am 03.05.2012 09:47, schrieb Sebastian Benoit:
>> Martin Bley(martin.b...@bvl.bund.de) on 2012.05.03 08:49:41 +0200: I
>> think this is still broken in 5.1?
>
> Yes, 5.1 was already finished at the end of march. I also dont think
> anything c
Martin Bley(martin.b...@bvl.bund.de) on 2012.05.03 08:49:41 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> Am 28.03.2012 13:30, schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> > Looks like this probably got broken in the proc.c privsep reorganization.
> > Try 'cvs up -D 2011/05/08" in src/usr.sbin/relayd and relayctl and
> rebuilding.
> >
> > Dat
Hi,
Am 28.03.2012 13:30, schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> Looks like this probably got broken in the proc.c privsep reorganization.
> Try 'cvs up -D 2011/05/08" in src/usr.sbin/relayd and relayctl and
rebuilding.
>
> Date: 2011/05/09 13:08:47
> Author: reyk
> Branch: HEAD
> Tag: (none)
> Log:
> Reorgan
Awesome it works, thanks !
I just had to make a slight change to the config file and add a "check
icmp" on the redirect rules, without that relayd dies with an error.
Except this minor change I kept my initial file and it now works well in
transparent mode.
So there really is something broken in t
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to forward port using relayd which works but what I really need
> is transparent relaying and I cannot make that one works :/
Looks like this probably got broken in the proc.c privsep reorganization.
Try 'cvs up -D 2011/05/08" in src/usr.sbi
2012/3/28 Eric Furman :
> To reinforce again to those that don't get it.
> EVERYTHING at Calomelshit.fuck is bullshit
> out of date fucking garbage.
> That is C a l o m e l dot o r g
> It is an insult to OBSD that this site still exists.
> It displays open contempt to the OBSD community
> by its ve
To reinforce again to those that don't get it.
EVERYTHING at Calomelshit.fuck is bullshit
out of date fucking garbage.
That is C a l o m e l dot o r g
It is an insult to OBSD that this site still exists.
It displays open contempt to the OBSD community
by its very existence.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012, a
wk0_oq7MxwbgvyEZ=f...@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-03-28, Bjxrn Knutson wrote:
> Hi
> I don't know if you have seen this article at
> https://calomel.org/relayd.html , and or if it can help you .
This page about relayd is for OpenBSD 4.6. Even if it were up-to-date
it still doesn't cover the situat
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Bjxrn Knutson wrote:
I'm not even going to repeat that web address to give it more
search results. caloshit.garbage. something like that.
Everything on that web site is out of date garbage.
Please stop spreading misinformation.
Thank You.
* Bjxrn Knutson [2012-03-28 11:31]:
> I don't know if you have seen this article at
> https://calomel.org/relayd.html , and or if it can help you .
certainly not. everything on calomel.org is garbage.
reading some other fairy tale is more insightful.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@op
Hi
I don't know if you have seen this article at
https://calomel.org/relayd.html , and or if it can help you .
Den 28/03/2012 11.10 skrev "Schmurfy" :
> Hi,
>
> Mike Belopuhov:
> I tried with your patch but nothing more is shown, when I connect the
> client I just get:
>
> proc_dispatch: parent 1
Hi,
Mike Belopuhov:
I tried with your patch but nothing more is shown, when I connect the
client I just get:
proc_dispatch: parent 1 got imsg 42 from relay 4
proc_dispatch: relay 1 got imsg 42 from parent
relay_dispatch_parent: session 1: expired
The thing that is really bothering me is that "ex
Hi,
You need to tell PF to intercept packets and redirect them to the relayd
process.
pass in on em2 inet proto tcp to any port www divert-to 192.168.20.1 port
8000
pass out log(all) on em1 divert-reply
You can find some more detailed information regarding relayd transparent
proxying in this thr
17 matches
Mail list logo
