Re: trunk(4) and non-standard MTU

2012-11-27 Thread mxb
Yes, it's not working. I might have mixed up with fbsd. My bad, sorry //mxb On 23 nov 2012, at 15:33, Janne Johansson wrote: > Can you show the output of "ifconfig trunk0" after you have run this? > And uname -a since a moderately recent -current wont allow mtus >1500 > when I test. > > 2012/

Re: trunk(4) and non-standard MTU

2012-11-23 Thread Janne Johansson
Can you show the output of "ifconfig trunk0" after you have run this? And uname -a since a moderately recent -current wont allow mtus >1500 when I test. 2012/9/18 mxb : > /etc/hostname.em0: > up mtu 9000 > > /etc/hostname.em1 > up mtu 9000 > > /etc/hostname.trunk0 > trunkproto lacp trunkport em0 t

Re: trunk(4) and non-standard MTU

2012-09-18 Thread mxb
/etc/hostname.em0: up mtu 9000 /etc/hostname.em1 up mtu 9000 /etc/hostname.trunk0 trunkproto lacp trunkport em0 trunkport em1 10.10.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 -inet6 mtu 9000 "mtu 9000" in hostname.trunk0 probably not needed as it will get its' correct mtu from em0. //mxb On 09/18/2012 10:04

Re: trunk(4) and non-standard MTU

2012-09-18 Thread mxb
Yes you can, but the real hw has to support it as well. On 09/18/2012 02:34 AM, S. Scott wrote: > Is it possible to use non-standard (1500) MTU on a trunk(4) > pseudo-interface or on the real em(4) interfaces that comprise the > trunk0 interface, or on the VLANs carried therein. We'd like to use