* Theo de Raadt [2010-06-02 17:18]:
> Where's the diffs?
exactly.
talk is cheap.
I do see some ways to make altq in OpenBSD better & easier. pf would
still be the major entry point of course.
irix ramblings are completely useless and if they have any effect at
all they lower my motivation to wo
On Wed, June 2, 2010 13:37, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> > Hello Misc,
>> >
>> > Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
>> Who would want this? This was the main reason for me to switch my
>> routers to OpenBSD. (consistency, ease of configuring)
>> I didn't want to fiddle w
2010/6/3 irix :
> Hello Misc,
>
> Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
Nobody here is stopping you from using Linux.
> > Hello Misc,
> >
> > Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
> Who would want this? This was the main reason for me to switch my
> routers to OpenBSD. (consistency, ease of configuring)
> I didn't want to fiddle with iptables and tc, search in outdated
> tc documenta
irix wrote:
> Hello Misc,
>
> Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
Who would want this? This was the main reason for me to switch my
routers to OpenBSD. (consistency, ease of configuring)
I didn't want to fiddle with iptables and tc, search in outdated
tc documentati
2010/6/2 Janne Johansson :
> 2010/6/2 irix
>
>> Hello Misc,
>>
>> All of a sudden started talking about some fixes. Have I mentioned
>> somewhere that something needs to be corrected,
>> or that something is not working? I just said about remaking to simplify
>> the code.
>>
>
> You said: "Or r
2010/6/2 irix
> Hello Misc,
>
> All of a sudden started talking about some fixes. Have I mentioned
> somewhere that something needs to be corrected,
> or that something is not working? I just said about remaking to simplify
> the code.
>
You said: "Or replace altq to something else, more fast
> Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
It is not going to happen.
Hello Misc,
Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
--
Best regards,
irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
> All of a sudden started talking about some fixes. Have I mentioned
> somewhere that something needs to be corrected,
>or that something is not working? I just said about remaking to simplify
> the code.
> Alternatives queue was initially conceived as framework in which you can
> with mi
Hello Misc,
All of a sudden started talking about some fixes. Have I mentioned somewhere
that something needs to be corrected,
or that something is not working? I just said about remaking to simplify the
code.
Alternatives queue was initially conceived as framework in which you can with
m
2010/6/2 irix :
> Hello Misc,
>
> But at least you can say why?
>
>>no kidding. As we've told "irix" before, it will not happen.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
Because it makes my VoIP phones at home and a friends workplace go
from hit-and-miss to...
Gregory Edigarov ha scritto:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:37:35 +0300
irix wrote:
Hello Misc,
But at least you can say why?
Obvious: don't fix what's not broken.
Gregory, its an hard concept to get by most of the people :)
no kidding. As we've told "irix" before, it will not happe
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:37:35 +0300
irix wrote:
> Hello Misc,
>
> But at least you can say why?
Obvious: don't fix what's not broken.
>
> >no kidding. As we've told "irix" before, it will not happen.
>
--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
Why?
(There, I said it.)
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
irix
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 7:38 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: traffic management
Hello Misc,
But at least you can say why?
>no kidding. As we'
Isn't the onus on the one asking for change to list why it should be
changed, and to contribute the code to show why your approach is
superior, since Theo has apparently told you before it ain't
happening?
On 6/1/10, irix wrote:
> Hello Misc,
>
> But at least you can say why?
>
>>no kidding. As
Hello Misc,
But at least you can say why?
>no kidding. As we've told "irix" before, it will not happen.
--
Best regards,
irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
Ouch. I like IRIX. ex-SGI employee 43951. :)
---
James A. Peltier james_a_pelt...@yahoo.ca
- Original Message
> From: Theo de Raadt
> To: Jan Stary
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 2:40:37 PM
> Subject: Re: traffic management
>
> > &g
> > Hello Misc,
> >
> > Are there any plans have changed in the system of traffic control?
> > For example removal of code altq from pf and make a separate management
> > interface traffic other than pf.
> > Or replace altq to something else, more fast,
> > simple and functional. Or revision of a
On Jun 01 20:21:16, irix wrote:
> Hello Misc,
>
> Are there any plans have changed in the system of traffic control?
> For example removal of code altq from pf and make a separate management
> interface traffic other than pf.
> Or replace altq to something else, more fast,
> simple and functional
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:21:16 +0700, irix wrote:
Hello Misc,
Are there any plans have changed in the system of traffic control?
For example removal of code altq from pf and make a separate management
interface traffic other than pf.
Or replace altq to something else, more fast,
simple an
21 matches
Mail list logo
