Re: systat vm question

2006-02-08 Thread Srebrenko Sehic
The latest, which is, AFAIK, 2.58. On 2/8/06, Jason Houx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Srebrenko, > > What firmware are you using on your controller? > > Jason > > On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Srebrenko Sehic wrote: > > > You can also try to update to -rOPENBSD_3_8. All noticeable > > performance problems w

Re: systat vm question

2006-02-08 Thread Jason Houx
Srebrenko, What firmware are you using on your controller? Jason On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Srebrenko Sehic wrote: You can also try to update to -rOPENBSD_3_8. All noticeable performance problems went away with some important patches since the release. I bet you'll see the load go away. And yes, as

Re: systat vm question

2006-02-07 Thread Srebrenko Sehic
You can also try to update to -rOPENBSD_3_8. All noticeable performance problems went away with some important patches since the release. I bet you'll see the load go away. And yes, as Henning said, 200 interrupts/second is nothing. My ciss(4) controllers go up to 5000 interrupts/seconds. But hey,

Re: systat vm question

2006-02-07 Thread Jason Houx
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Henning Brauer wrote: * Jason Houx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-07 18:53]: Interrupts are at 489 total with CISS0 doing over 200 no, 200 int/s doesn't even remotely smell like a problem. Great thanks for providing me a baseline. I guess I will just try the next snapsh

Re: systat vm question

2006-02-07 Thread Henning Brauer
* Jason Houx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-07 18:53]: > Interrupts are at 489 total > with CISS0 doing over 200 > > load with 2 users hits 2.18 so far. My question is the No-cache section > what has no-cache, and does 200 interrupts seem excessive for a Hardware > Raid? Does this point anyone t

Re: systat vm question

2006-02-07 Thread Jason Houx
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Niall O'Higgins wrote: Your question isn't entirely clear to me, but I think you might be confused. Quite possible as this is a bit new territory for me to be going into. Thanks for the help The "No-cache section" you refer to is part of the namei (name translation) dis

Re: systat vm question

2006-02-07 Thread Niall O'Higgins
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:48:53PM -0500, Jason Houx wrote: > the "No-cache" section says this > > No-cache > Miss = 523 > % = 67 > > Interrupts are at 489 total > with CISS0 doing over 200 > > load with 2 users hits 2.18 so far. My question is the No-cache section > what has no-cache, Your q