> if you want help, your post should start "we have this router and i expect
> it to be going that fast, but it only goes this fast." if your router is
> already "fast enough", it can't get any faster. there's a only finite
> number of clients, porn, and pipe to connect them.
>
I belive recent
Antti Nykdnen schrieb:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:04:48AM +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
"You see, most blokes will be playing at 10. Youre on 10, all the way
up, all the way up...Where can you go from there? Nowhere. What we do,
is if we need that extra push over the cliff...Eleven. One l
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:04:48AM +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> "You see, most blokes will be playing at 10. Youre on 10, all the way
> up, all the way up...Where can you go from there? Nowhere. What we do,
> is if we need that extra push over the cliff...Eleven. One louder."
"Why dont y
Ted Unangst schrieb:
i don't understand why people keep asking the same question. if there
were some "fast" sysctl knob, why would we set it to "slow"? why would
there even be such a retarded knob?
From Spinal Tap:
"You see, most blokes will be playing at 10. Youre on 10, all the way
up,
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Diego Augusto Dalmolin wrote:
> because this server also handle spamd/squid/ftp-proxy...
> I4ve forgotten to mention that..
that would have been helpful to know. but if your proxy has a backlog of
128 connections, a backlog of 129 or even 3456 connections is not going to
he
because this server also handle spamd/squid/ftp-proxy...
I4ve forgotten to mention that..
I4ve got a book (Absolute BSD - The ultimate guide to FreeBSD) I know
this isn4t a openbsd book.. but I4ve got some information about
NMBCLUSTER and tcp.sendspace/recvspace that might help
Sorry for the inco
Diego Augusto Dalmolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It handles the size of listen() queue...
If you know that, then why would you think it needs to be increased to
do routing and NAT?
Adam
It handles the size of listen() queue...
I know openbsd is a great SO.. IMHO the best one I ever worked whit!!
and I also know Theo & CO. are doing their best to maintain this system
I just want to learn.. and I thought misc@ would be a place where I
could find relevant information.. my 10 questi
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Diego Augusto Dalmolin wrote:
> Ok but... don4t you the default values like kern.somaxconn=128
> are too small for an OBSD router/nat with 2 x Gig lans + 2 x 4Mbps
> internet conections
do you even know what kern.somaxconn does?
--
And that's why we need each other.
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 12:05:48 -0300, Diego Augusto Dalmolin proclaimed...
> Ok but... don4t you the default values like kern.somaxconn=128
> are too small for an OBSD router/nat with 2 x Gig lans + 2 x 4Mbps
> internet conections
Maybe, but don't expect support.
That said, here's what we use on
Ok but... don4t you the default values like kern.somaxconn=128
are too small for an OBSD router/nat with 2 x Gig lans + 2 x 4Mbps
internet conections
2005/8/31, Diego Augusto Dalmolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Where I could find a material for studding how to improve OBSD network
> performance to max
Quoting Diego Augusto Dalmolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Where I could find a material for studding how to improve OBSD network
> performance to maximum, using sysctl, kernel compilation, etc...
>
>
> --
> Diego Augusto Dalmolin
> (41) 9648-0882
>
>
Search the archives, this has been discussed not s
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:47:54 -0300
Diego Augusto Dalmolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where I could find a material for studding how to improve OBSD network
> performance to maximum, using sysctl,
man sysctl
> kernel compilation, etc...
Well, simple, DON'T compile your own kernel. Because those
13 matches
Mail list logo
