The union of Ted and my diffs has been committed, so this is fixed for -current.
Philip Guenther
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Philip Guenther wrote:
> Instead, how about making comply with SUS/POSIX, which
> says that in a conforming environment this header file shall define
> TCP_NODELAY and may declare additional TCP_* macros, but shall not
> otherwise intrude on the applicatiojn visible namespa
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, hyjial wrote:
>
> > There is a u_int on line 50 of sys/tcp.h. u_int is defined only if
> > __BSD_VISIBLE is which it is not is _POSIX_SOURCE is defined.
> >
> > Is this intended ?
>
> No. Easy fix.
(This is PR 6192)
Instead, how ab
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, hyjial wrote:
> There is a u_int on line 50 of sys/tcp.h. u_int is defined only if
> __BSD_VISIBLE is which it is not is _POSIX_SOURCE is defined.
>
> Is this intended ?
No. Easy fix.
Index: tcp.h
===
RCS file:
On 10/21/2010 09:52 AM, hyjial wrote:
Hi list !
There is a u_int on line 50 of sys/tcp.h. u_int is defined only if
__BSD_VISIBLE is which it is not is _POSIX_SOURCE is defined.
Is this intended ?
Hit into this when trying to build a program which uses libsoup.
Thanks,
hyjial
I was hit with
5 matches
Mail list logo