Hi!
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 05:01:20PM -0400, Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
>Did you read suexec(8)?
Wouldn't one also need to copy over the suexec binary to the chroot for
chrooted httpds, nowadays? That isn't mentioned in the suexec(8) manual
page.
Kind regards,
Hannah.
* Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-01 10:05]:
> Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
>
> > No, I meant this:
> > "In order to work correctly, the suexec binary should be owned by
> > ``root''
> > and have the SETUID execution bit set. OpenBSD currently does not in-
> > stall suexec with the SETUID bit
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:17:34AM +0300, Lars Nood??n wrote:
> Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
> >> suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sbin/suexec
> >
> > Did you read suexec(8)?
>
> I expect you mean this?
>
> "Because this program is only used internally by httpd(8),
> there are no oth
Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
> No, I meant this:
> "In order to work correctly, the suexec binary should be owned by
> ``root''
> and have the SETUID execution bit set. OpenBSD currently does not in-
> stall suexec with the SETUID bit set, so a change of file mode is neces-
> sary to enable it..."
Tha
On 1-Sep-08, at 3:17 AM, Lars Noodin wrote:
Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sbin/suexec
Did you read suexec(8)?
I expect you mean this?
"Because this program is only used internally by httpd(8),
there are no other ways to directly invoke suexec.
Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
>> suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sbin/suexec
>
> Did you read suexec(8)?
I expect you mean this?
"Because this program is only used internally by httpd(8),
there are no other ways to directly invoke suexec."
No. I was looking at mod_perl and have
On 31-Aug-08, at 3:21 PM, Lars Noodin wrote:
Listing the modules in Apache/1.3.29 (4.4-current base, i386 snapshot
from 29 Aug) gives a warning regarding suexec.
Regards
-Lars
# httpd -l
Compiled-in modules:
http_core.c
mod_env.c
. . .
mod_ssl.c
suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/sb
7 matches
Mail list logo
