On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:36:24 -0400, Frank Bax wrote:
>
>>Rod Whitworth wrote:
>>> nixpix:
>>> #!/bin/sh
>>> cd /root/data
>>> rm -f nixspam
>>> ftp http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/nixspam.gz
>>> if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
>>> gunzip nixspam.g
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:36:24 -0400, Frank Bax wrote:
>Rod Whitworth wrote:
>> nixpix:
>> #!/bin/sh
>> cd /root/data
>> rm -f nixspam
>> ftp http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/nixspam.gz
>> if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
>> gunzip nixspam.gz
>> cut -d " " -f 1 nixspam >/var/db/nixspam
>> fi
>
>
>
It is being worked on. It will be fixed shortly.
2009/10/1 Ted Unangst :
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Steve wrote:
>> spamd-setup is generating a 404 not found message while trying to download
>> /spamd/nixspam.gz
>>
>> Is there a process change that I have missed or is this temporarily bro
Rod Whitworth wrote:
nixpix:
#!/bin/sh
cd /root/data
rm -f nixspam
ftp http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/nixspam.gz
if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
gunzip nixspam.gz
cut -d " " -f 1 nixspam >/var/db/nixspam
fi
Any particular reason why you don't use:
zcat nixspam.gz | cut -d " " -f 1
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Steve wrote:
> spamd-setup is generating a 404 not found message while trying to download
> /spamd/nixspam.gz
>
> Is there a process change that I have missed or is this temporarily broken
?
One of the reasons people are told to check the archives is so that
they
On 2009-10-01 14:39, Toni Mueller wrote:
I didn't check whether the stale file gets removed, but thought about
using a different source instead. If spamd(8) could use RBLs in
addition to static tables, that would ease the problem, too.
The concept of RBLs aren't in line with the idea that spamd
On Thu, 01.10.2009 at 21:16:30 +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> Me too, but I learned my lesson first time around. Now I have a cronjob
> that runs a script which attempts to get the file. If that fails the
> existing local nixspam file is used.
I didn't check whether the stale file gets removed, bu
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:26:43 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Wed, 30.09.2009 at 09:12:16 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
>> Again? sheesh, it wasn't supposed to, we had talked to them.
>
>yes, again. I get a 404 all the time.
>
>
>Kind regards,
>--Toni++
>
Me too, but I learned my lesson first time a
Hi,
On Wed, 30.09.2009 at 09:12:16 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> Again? sheesh, it wasn't supposed to, we had talked to them.
yes, again. I get a 404 all the time.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Again? sheesh, it wasn't supposed to, we had talked to them.
2009/9/30 K.R. (Randy) Lewis :
> Has anyone else noticed the nixspam list (via link) disappearing from
> the http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/ page today?
>
> Randy
> --
>
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED w
10 matches
Mail list logo
