Re: shmmax

2023-11-10 Thread Janne Johansson
> As my system is still fast and running properly after this tweak I need > to ask if you think that sysupgrade requires or will (I doubt) any > special value for shmmax? If it required a special setting, it would set that special setting. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive

Re: shmmax

2023-11-10 Thread Daniele B.
Ok, received. Thnx Nov 10, 2023 15:25:58 Crystal Kolipe : > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 03:17:29PM +0100, Daniele B. wrote: >> As my system is still fast and running properly after this tweak I need >> to ask if you think that sysupgrade requires or will (I doubt) any >> special value for shmmax? >

Re: shmmax

2023-11-10 Thread Crystal Kolipe
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 03:17:29PM +0100, Daniele B. wrote: > As my system is still fast and running properly after this tweak I need > to ask if you think that sysupgrade requires or will (I doubt) any > special value for shmmax? Leave it at the default setting.

Re: shmmax

2023-11-10 Thread Daniele B.
As my system is still fast and running properly after this tweak I need to ask if you think that sysupgrade requires or will (I doubt) any special value for shmmax? == Daniele Bonini "Daniele B." wrote: > > Seems this tweak needs a vast knowledge, a certain kind > of usage profile and some

Re: shmmax

2023-11-09 Thread Daniele B.
Paul de Weerd wrote: > Yes: don't twist knobs when you don't understand what they do. Thnx, it is better then a Theo *template* .. == Daniele Bonini

Re: shmmax

2023-11-09 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:04:34PM +0100, Daniele B. wrote: | I'm guessing that for my usage profile I can go with an optimization | like this: | > sysctl kern.shminfo.shmmax=524288 | | Any more feedback? Yes: don't twist knobs when you don't understand what they do. -- >[<++>-]

Re: shmmax

2023-11-09 Thread Daniele B.
Janne Johansson wrote: > > I'm here asking what > > it is exactly the meaning for 'shared memory' here, and if implying > > that it is eventually the max memory allocable to the graphic card > > is correct. > > No. This is not related to graphics card memory Seems this tweak needs a vast kn

Re: shmmax

2023-11-09 Thread Janne Johansson
> I'm here asking what > it is exactly the meaning for 'shared memory' here, and if implying > that it is eventually the max memory allocable to the graphic card is > correct. No. This is not related to graphics card memory -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive.