> Edd, although no developer I am interested in assisting.
> Personally, following the six month -stable cycle fits my
> needs better than following -current. I have used the diffs
> at http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/ as a resource for creating
> -stable packages and I now see UNSUPPORTED 4.3 packages
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edd
> Barrett
> Subject: Re: security fixes for packages
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Unix Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The developers don't care
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Unix Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The developers don't care about your security.
No, the developers are all very busy and don't have time to work on
stable packages.
I'm so sick of hearing about this that I am willing to co-ordinate a
group of developers to
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Comhte wrote:
Ok, so does it mean that -stable or -release are useless ??? and
people buy useless CDs every 6 monthes ? I can't believe it.
I really don't understand why these fixes are not provided anymore.
Then do something about it and start contributing too. May be y
So i make a proposal to avoid "clueless guy" like me to ask this
question which seems to cause so many troubles:
What do you think about posting a message on this page:
http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html
which could say in a better english as mine :) :
"OpenBSD -stable packages are not mainta
uh uh ! Don't be so nervous guy !
I just would like to know the reason why these fixes weren't provided. I
can understand now as you tell me (so gently...) that there isn't enough
people to work on it. Ok i know the time such projects can take and it
would have been easier to tell things like th
I've used OpenBSD-RELEASE +patches a long time on my Desktop, and
servers of course...
Besides the fact that inevitable, after some time a couple of software
gets outdated, I feel a lot more secure with my outdated OpenBSD than
with any Linux out there on the bleeding edge of software versions.
I'
Unix Fan wrote:
LEFIEUX Morgan wrote:
i was looking at this page http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html and
would like to know why there is no security fixes for packages after 4.1
release ?
The developers don't care about your security.
They do. Just run current.
This topic has been done
Comhte wrote:
Ok, so does it mean that -stable or -release are useless ??? and people
buy useless CDs every 6 monthes ? I can't believe it.
I really don't understand why these fixes are not provided anymore.
Then do something about it and start contributing too. May be you will
see how painfu
On May 13, 2008, at 5:07 PM, ComC(te <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, so does it mean that -stable or -release are useless ??? and
people buy useless CDs every 6 monthes ? I can't believe it.
I really don't understand why these fixes are not provided anymore.
Keep reading Nick's email until you
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Unix Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LEFIEUX Morgan wrote:
>
> > i was looking at this page http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html and
>
> > would like to know why there is no security fixes for packages after 4.1
>
> > release ?
>
>
>
> The developers don't c
Ok, so does it mean that -stable or -release are useless ??? and people
buy useless CDs every 6 monthes ? I can't believe it.
I really don't understand why these fixes are not provided anymore.
i don't want to go back to Debian... ;)
Stijn a icrit :
Check the archives. This question has been a
LEFIEUX Morgan wrote:
> i was looking at this page http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html and
> would like to know why there is no security fixes for packages after 4.1
> release ?
The developers don't care about your security.
This topic has been done to death, developer incompetence wa
Check the archives. This question has been answered already several times.
Here's an answer from Nick Holland on such a question:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119931837024703&w=2
BR,
Stijn
LEFIEUX Morgan wrote:
Hi,
i was looking at this page http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html and
w
14 matches
Mail list logo