Re: root on raidframe

2005-10-24 Thread Ikmal Ahmad
Aha... I manage to do the basic installation using raid1(mirror). As attach was the method that I use :) Will put it in my page later. Any comment are welcome :) On 10/24/05, Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:42:35 -0400 > Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: root on raidframe

2005-10-24 Thread Nick Holland
Ken Gunderson wrote: ... > The application in this case is a routing firewall/proxy server for a 3 > legged network configuration. Resources to implement a carp setup are > not available. The objective for the system: > > 1) to be as self healing as possible > 2) minimize downtime resulting fro

Re: root on raidframe

2005-10-23 Thread Ken Gunderson
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:42:35 -0400 Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ken Gunderson wrote: > > Greets: > > > > I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once > > I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break > > it, test out recovery scenar

Re: root on raidframe

2005-10-23 Thread Nick Holland
Ken Gunderson wrote: > Greets: > > I've been exploring root on raidframe w/a pair of mirrored disks. Once > I bring something like this up I then go ahead and do my best to break > it, test out recovery scenarios, etc. smart. VERY smart. :) > Which brings me to the question > at hand. > > Fol

Re: root on raidframe

2005-10-23 Thread Ken Gunderson
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:43:26 +0200 Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/23/05, Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now my question is whether there is some way to shorten > > this delay that I'm missing? > > Did you read through the list archives? This matter is well-discuss

Re: root on raidframe

2005-10-23 Thread Rogier Krieger
On 10/23/05, Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now my question is whether there is some way to shorten > this delay that I'm missing? Did you read through the list archives? This matter is well-discussed. Other OS'es, such as NetBSD, use a different way for the checking of parity (i.e. in