Original Message
Subject: Re:relayctl host disable doesn't loop through all hosts
From: Reyk Floeter
To: Pierre-Yves Ritschard
CC: Pascal Lalonde , misc@openbsd.org
Date: Wed Apr 01 2009 09:57:24 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:22:44AM +0200, Pierre
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> no, it shouldn't be "fixed". one host can have different services with
> different states at the same time.
But isn't that why you can specify an id to disable just one service
on a host? The common use case for specifying a host name would
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:22:44AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
> * Pascal Lalonde (plalo...@overnet.qc.ca) wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been playing with relayd lately. There is a behavior which seems
> > unintuitive and I was wondering if that was a bug or the intended
> > behavior.
> >
* Pascal Lalonde (plalo...@overnet.qc.ca) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been playing with relayd lately. There is a behavior which seems
> unintuitive and I was wondering if that was a bug or the intended
> behavior.
>
It's the intended behavior but I have been meaning to fix that at some
point.
> Wh
4 matches
Mail list logo