Hi,
Reading this a bit late but something doesn't sound quite right. Just
ignore me if I'm reading this wrong..
An IPSec tunnel policy defines both the local network *and* the remote
network. So for a packet to be encrypted it must have both a source IP
address within the local subnet and a desti
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 07:58:39PM +0100, Aurelien Martin wrote:
> > net.inet.icmp.rediraccept=1 # 1=Accept ICMP redirects
>
> Good to know this feature :)
>
> > Are systems behind the firewall able to route to and reach the remote
> network?
>
> Yes all is working.
>
> > we could route th
pecifying
>>> the -I switch on ping, or -b for ssh.
>>>
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>>> Von: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] Im
>>>> Auftrag von Aurelien Martin
>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 10. Februar 201
;>> Gesendet: Montag, 10. Februar 2014 16:10
>>> An: Mitja MuženiÄ; misc@openbsd.org
>>> Betreff: Re: reach a remote LAN through IPSEC from the router
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Mitja,
>>>
>>> When I add the route manually it's working l
Februar 2014 16:10
An: Mitja Muženič; misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: reach a remote LAN through IPSEC from the router
Hi Mitja,
When I add the route manually it's working like a charm.
But after that, all machines of my LAN ping with this following form
(Redirect Host). What does it mean
> 10 feb 2014 kl. 16:10 skrev Aurelien Martin <01aurel...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Mitja,
>
> When I add the route manually it's working like a charm.
>
> But after that, all machines of my LAN ping with this following form
> (Redirect Host). What does it mean ? For me the router rewrite the
> desti
Hi Mitja,
When I add the route manually it's working like a charm.
But after that, all machines of my LAN ping with this following form
(Redirect Host). What does it mean ? For me the router rewrite the
destination that create an overhead.
$ ping 192.168.10.1
PING 192.168.10.1 (192.168.10.1
7 matches
Mail list logo
