On Wed, 25 May 2005, Ted Unangst wrote:
> it is part of G. we will wait to see what effects it has.
and now it's option P. for some apps, it interfered with normal operation
too much.
--
And that's why he won't get my vote.
it is part of G. we will wait to see what effects it has.
--
quit whining you haven't done anything wrong
because frankly you haven't done much of anything
Hello!
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:17:59PM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
>[...]
>This would make all 4/8-byte mallocs take up one page(4k) each if I
>understand this correctly.
>That's fine for debugging, but probably too expensive for normal usage.
I tend to agree. While most applications will
Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
>> when malloc gets a request with a size equal to the size of a pointer, we
>> can allocate a whole page, and return a pointer 4 bytes from the end.
>> the
>> four bytes allocated are useable, but don't touch the fifth or any later
>> ones. (8 bytes on 64bit archs).
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
