I am interested in how these things work internally in your project,
and I also wondered whether I'd done something wrong (eg. inadvertantly
fetched stale code), as, at first, I assumed that all these builds
should occur in sync. Now, when I was reporting problems, the large
difference in serial n
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:46:36AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 31.03.2010 at 17:12:30 -0700, Philip Guenther
> wrote:
> > The i386 build has been around a lot longer than amd64, so comparing
> > absolutes doesn't reveal the relative rate.
>
> that doesn't sound compelling to m
Hi,
On Wed, 31.03.2010 at 17:12:30 -0700, Philip Guenther
wrote:
> The i386 build has been around a lot longer than amd64, so comparing
> absolutes doesn't reveal the relative rate.
that doesn't sound compelling to me, as, afair, the serial numbers
are reset on every release. Eg. I can see this
>On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:
>> comparing the build dates and serial numbers of kernels, I get the
>> impression that amd64 kernels are only built once in a while, so to
>> say, compared to i386 kernels, because the #148 kernel for amd64 is much
>> more recent than the #44
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:
> comparing the build dates and serial numbers of kernels, I get the
> impression that amd64 kernels are only built once in a while, so to
> say, compared to i386 kernels, because the #148 kernel for amd64 is much
> more recent than the #448 one
5 matches
Mail list logo
