Re: pf.conf(5) buglet wrt logging

2005-12-10 Thread Tamas TEVESZ
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005, Adriaan Misc wrote: > I interpret it that you need a "pass" before the log ;) that was unfair. sorry for the noise :( -- [-] mkdir /nonexistent

Re: pf.conf(5) buglet wrt logging

2005-12-10 Thread Adriaan Misc
On 12/10/05, Tamas TEVESZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] , what's the correct syntax > for logging in a nat(/binat/rdr) rule? "nat on pcn0 from > 192.168.1.0/24 to any -> (pcn0)" works fine, "nat log on pcn..." gives > a syntax error). > > if the diff below is correct, how can one log nats/rdrs