On 2021-10-10, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 02:48:04PM +0300, Barbaros Bilek wrote:
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>> I think you suggest me some work around like max-src-conn-rate, right?
>
> I would think both the rate and the number of simultaneous connections could
> be relevant
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 02:48:04PM +0300, Barbaros Bilek wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> I think you suggest me some work around like max-src-conn-rate, right?
I would think both the rate and the number of simultaneous connections could be
relevant here, yes.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member
Hello Peter,
I think you suggest me some work around like max-src-conn-rate, right?
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 5:07 PM Peter Nicolai Mathias Hansteen <
pe...@bsdly.net> wrote:
>
>
> > 7. okt. 2021 kl. 15:58 skrev Barbaros Bilek :
> >
> > Hello misc,
> >
> > I try to block port scanning attempts with
Hi Stuart,
I have 'block log all' as a rule and yes i have several ports that are open.
I was told to take precautions against port scanning. I'm trying to achieve
that too. :/
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 4:13 PM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2021-10-07, Barbaros Bilek wrote:
> > Hello misc,
> >
> >
> 7. okt. 2021 kl. 15:58 skrev Barbaros Bilek :
>
> Hello misc,
>
> I try to block port scanning attempts with OpenBSD 6.9/amd64 + PF.
> At the top of my pf.conf i've added these lines but it didn't work.
>
> block in quick proto tcp all flags SF/SFRA label bps1
> block in quick proto tcp all
On 2021-10-07, Barbaros Bilek wrote:
> Hello misc,
>
> I try to block port scanning attempts with OpenBSD 6.9/amd64 + PF.
> At the top of my pf.conf i've added these lines but it didn't work.
>
> block in quick proto tcp all flags SF/SFRA label bps1
> block in quick proto tcp all flags FPU/SFRAUP
6 matches
Mail list logo
