On 2009-04-10, Neal Hogan wrote:
> As of recent updates to -current, the latest of which was today
> (04/10/09), my pf rules are not loading due to a "syntax error" in my
> scrub line. I have not touched my pf.conf in a while, so the
> difference must be from recent source. I don't remember exactl
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Dirk Mast wrote:
> When you follow -current, it's a good thing to read
>
> http://openbsd.org/faq/current.html
>
> or the CVS logs.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=123919875714273&w=2
ah yes . . . I didn't see changes on the pf faq and jumped the gun. Than
Neal Hogan wrote:
> As of recent updates to -current, the latest of which was today
> (04/10/09), my pf rules are not loading due to a "syntax error" in my
> scrub line. I have not touched my pf.conf in a while, so the
> difference must be from recent source. I don't remember exactly when
> this st
When you follow -current, it's a good thing to read
http://openbsd.org/faq/current.html
or the CVS logs.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=123919875714273&w=2
Neal Hogan wrote:
> As of recent updates to -current, the latest of which was today
> (04/10/09), my pf rules are not loading due t
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
> As of recent updates to -current, the latest of which was today
> (04/10/09), my pf rules are not loading due to a "syntax error" in my
> scrub line. I have not touched my pf.conf in a while, so the
> difference must be from recent source. I don't remember
5 matches
Mail list logo