* poncenby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Why? OpenBSD's libc is pretty slim already. If you have need of a
> > further cut-down libc, you could trim it more.
>
> Because I want dietlibc for a fnord installation and haven't got the
> time or experience to fiddle around and get fnord to work with
> anyt
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, poncenby wrote:
> > Why? OpenBSD's libc is pretty slim already. If you have need of a
> > further cut-down libc, you could trim it more.
>
> Because I want dietlibc for a fnord installation and haven't got the time or
> experience to fiddle around and get fnord to work with an
Damien Miller wrote:
Why? OpenBSD's libc is pretty slim already. If you have need of a
further cut-down libc, you could trim it more.
Because I want dietlibc for a fnord installation and haven't got the
time or experience to fiddle around and get fnord to work with anything
but dietlibc.
an
poncenby wrote:
Hello all
being a naturally lazy person i was wondering whether anyone knows of a
nice easy, step-by-step guide to modifying the dietlibc source so it
will compile on openbsd 3.7.
Why? OpenBSD's libc is pretty slim already. If you have need of a
further cut-down libc, you c
4 matches
Mail list logo
