Hi,
Vasily Kolobkov wrote on Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 05:20:56PM +0200:
> as of not long ago the plain text versions of the faqs went missing
> from http://www.openbsd.org/faq/{obsd,pf}-faq.txt
>
> wonder if that's for good?
Yes. They were deleted to reduce maintenance burden and to avoid
the ris
On 2014-03-18, Marko Cupać wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 01:15:16 + (UTC)
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> The ruleset is now traversed in order, changes made in match rules
>> are "sticky" and affect rules lower down in the ruleset. More
>> predictable, no more "oh this 'nat pass' rule which yo
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 01:15:16 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> The ruleset is now traversed in order, changes made in match rules
> are "sticky" and affect rules lower down in the ruleset. More
> predictable, no more "oh this 'nat pass' rule which you included
> halfway down the ruleset actua
On 2014-03-18, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I am studying obsd pf and saw there are no more nat rules and rdr rules the
> old way.
"old" - note that this is something from nearly 5 years ago.
See http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=125181847818600&w=2 for a
quick introduction. I'm sure i
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 09:53:43PM -0300, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I am studying obsd pf and saw there are no more nat rules and rdr rules the
> old way.
Yes, this changed with OpenBSD 4.7, in 2010. The change is documented
in the 4.7 Upgrade Guide: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgr
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:16:47 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> I still seem to be having problems with PF+VLANs.
>
> It seems that PF does not want to NAT traffic from my internal VLAN to my
> external VLAN IP address.
>
> Can someone advise if they have managed to get PF (NAT)
On 2007/06/04 15:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can someone advise if they have managed to get PF (NAT) + VLAN + CARP working
yes. if you want more help, give more information.
7 matches
Mail list logo
