Re: npppd failed enable pipex: Invalid argument

2020-08-17 Thread Marko Cupać
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:36:35 +0300 Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > Hello Marko. > > Can I propose you to try upcoming 6.8? We moved pppac(4) and pppx(4) > output processing out of kernel lock. pppx(4) output is still > serialised by netlock, but I hope we'll made it per-cpu before 6.8 > release. > >

Re: npppd failed enable pipex: Invalid argument

2020-08-16 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
> On 10 Aug 2020, at 14:00, Marko Cupać wrote: > >>> On 4 Aug 2020, at 17:04, Marko Cupać wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have recently upgraded (actually installed from scratch and copied >>> config files) one of my firewalls from 6.6 to 6.7, and (sys)patched >>> it to 017_dix. Everything wor

Re: npppd failed enable pipex: Invalid argument

2020-08-10 Thread Marko Cupać
> > On 4 Aug 2020, at 17:04, Marko Cupać wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have recently upgraded (actually installed from scratch and copied > > config files) one of my firewalls from 6.6 to 6.7, and (sys)patched > > it to 017_dix. Everything works great except my npppd setup. It > > starts fine, bu

Re: npppd failed enable pipex: Invalid argument

2020-08-04 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
> On 4 Aug 2020, at 17:04, Marko Cupać wrote: > > Hi, > > I have recently upgraded (actually installed from scratch and copied > config files) one of my firewalls from 6.6 to 6.7, and (sys)patched it > to 017_dix. Everything works great except my npppd setup. It starts > fine, but upon connec