Re: nat vpn pptp issues

2005-10-05 Thread Justin Krejci
Looks like this is the homepage for the project now. http://www.placid.tv/pie.php?page=FrickinPPTP On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:29 am, James Wright wrote: > frickin, discussed here: > http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20041009000521 > though the frickin sourceforge page does not a

Re: nat vpn pptp issues

2005-10-05 Thread James Wright
frickin, discussed here: http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20041009000521 though the frickin sourceforge page does not appear to be functional you can still download the tarball. Only supports one pptp server.

Re: nat vpn pptp issues

2005-10-04 Thread Chris Smith
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 04:32 pm, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote: > OpenBSD ignores the Call ID field in the GRE packets that PPTP > uses... So a design decision?

Re: nat vpn pptp issues

2005-10-04 Thread Melameth, Daniel D.
Chris Smith wrote: > On Tuesday 04 October 2005 03:38 pm, Peter Hessler wrote: > > True, this is a limitation of the PPTP spec. Go slap the IT Staff, > > and tell them to revert back to IPSec. > > While I agree on what should be done to their IT staff, and that IPSec > (from what little I know) i

Re: nat vpn pptp issues

2005-10-04 Thread Chris Smith
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 03:38 pm, Peter Hessler wrote: > True, this is a limitation of the PPTP spec. Go slap the IT Staff, > and tell them to revert back to IPSec. While I agree on what should be done to their IT staff, and that IPSec (from what little I know) is superior, it may be an issue

Re: nat vpn pptp issues

2005-10-04 Thread Peter Hessler
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 02:45:54PM -0400, Chris Smith wrote: :OpenBSD 3.7 doing NAT with pf. : :A group from another compnay was successfully using IPSec (through the :pf firewall) to tunnel to their corporate server. New personnel in :their IT staff decided to change from IPSec to PPTP (why oh