On 2006-03-14, Chris Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyhow... disklabel still acts strange. See the attached output and notice
> after I create wd0a, it sets the offset of wd0b to the beginning of wd0a
> instead of at the end of wd0a. Why is this?
I noticed the same problem on my X40 (although
Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:44:06PM -0800, Chris Paul wrote:
> | Nick Guenther wrote:
> | >
> | > Well, like was said, you lack fdisk and disklabel output. However, did
> | > you remember to mark the partition active? Also, you might have just
> | > messed up in disklabelling
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:44:06PM -0800, Chris Paul wrote:
| Nick Guenther wrote:
| >
| > Well, like was said, you lack fdisk and disklabel output. However, did
| > you remember to mark the partition active? Also, you might have just
| > messed up in disklabelling but I can't see how (unless you s
Nick Guenther wrote:
>
> Well, like was said, you lack fdisk and disklabel output. However, did
> you remember to mark the partition active? Also, you might have just
> messed up in disklabelling but I can't see how (unless you somehow put
> wd0a onto a part of the disk that gets overwritten for so
On 3/13/06, Chris Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Misc,
>
> I want to leave the pre-loaded Windows XP on the X40, so I:
>
> a) didn't let it convert to NTFS
> b) deleted the "IBM/Lenovo utility partition"
> c) resized part 0 (C)
> d) using OpenBSD install fdisk, created an OpenBSD partition
Chris Paul wrote:
> Now, after creating slice a, the OpenBSD disklabel does not do the math
> for me. It give me the same beginning offset as for wd0a. So I then: did
> the math (added all the offsets & created the partitions), but now it
> won't boot (it just goes ahead and boots XP).
Show us
6 matches
Mail list logo
