Re: mfi(4) support for SAS8704ELP

2008-04-05 Thread Alexander Hall
Alexander Hall wrote: Alexander Hall wrote: The man pages for mfi(4) does not mention that mfi supports SAS8704ELP, while the source seems to indicate so. I am about to buy new hardware and I just want to make sure that I do not buy anything non-supported or experimental, so cluesticks are a

Re: mfi(4) support for SAS8704ELP

2008-03-13 Thread Alexander Hall
Alexander Hall wrote: The man pages for mfi(4) does not mention that mfi supports SAS8704ELP, while the source seems to indicate so. I am about to buy new hardware and I just want to make sure that I do not buy anything non-supported or experimental, so cluesticks are appreciated. I've now

Re: mfi diff to try to fix 'not queued' errors

2008-02-19 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:11:58PM -0600, Vijay Sankar wrote: > On February 15, 2008 07:49:27 pm Marco Peereboom wrote: > > Making sure the folks who requested it see this... > > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:21:51PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > The diff below makes mfi use the 'backpre

Re: mfi diff to try to fix 'not queued' errors

2008-02-16 Thread Michael
Hi, Marco Peereboom schrieb: > Making sure the folks who requested it see this... > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:21:51PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > The diff below makes mfi use the 'backpressure' facility in the scsi > layer by allowing the retry of an i/o that can't be started. It >

Re: mfi diff to try to fix 'not queued' errors

2008-02-15 Thread Vijay Sankar
On February 15, 2008 07:49:27 pm Marco Peereboom wrote: > Making sure the folks who requested it see this... > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:21:51PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > The diff below makes mfi use the 'backpressure' facility in the scsi > layer by allowing the retry of an i/o tha

Re: mfi diff to try to fix 'not queued' errors

2008-02-15 Thread Marco Peereboom
Making sure the folks who requested it see this... On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:21:51PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: The diff below makes mfi use the 'backpressure' facility in the scsi layer by allowing the retry of an i/o that can't be started. It would be interesting to see if this helps

Re: mfi driver supporting asus SLI mainboards?

2007-12-28 Thread Matthias Tarasiewicz
ah, sorry, my bad - the Areca/Tekram TR-822 is said to have the same chipset as the ASUS-A8n-SLI-Deluxe. so the TR-822 seems to be sili not mfi... On 28.12.2007, at 11:48, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:20:58AM +0100, Matthias Tarasiewicz wrote: hello list, i just read that

Re: mfi driver supporting asus SLI mainboards?

2007-12-28 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:20:58AM +0100, Matthias Tarasiewicz wrote: > hello list, > i just read that the asus SLI mainboards have a silicon image sata chipset. > does that mean we can use this asus mainboards with the mfi driver in > openbsd? any experiences? > > regards, > matthias This is li

Re: mfi

2006-05-18 Thread Bob Beck
I should buy a few of these :) -Bob * Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-18 17:13]: > I just enabled the mfi driver (LSI/Dell MegaRAID SAS) in GENERIC on i386 & > amd64. > > I could use some test reports from the field concerning this controller. If > you have one ple