Re: max RAM

2013-06-15 Thread Nick Holland
I had a chance to briefly play with a monster amd64 system. 511GB worked, 520GB didn't. Machine had 1.5TB RAM in it and took over five minutes to "initialize memory", before even starting the POST, so that's as far as I got. It is entirely possible that this was HW dependent. Nick. On 06/15/13 1

Re: max RAM [solved]

2013-06-15 Thread Tony Berth
Thanks On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013-06-15, Tony Berth wrote: > > on a amd64 server. I don't know if the 4GB limit is still in place. > > 4.9 is the last release which was limited to 4GB on amd64. > > http://www.openbsd.org/50.html

Re: max RAM

2013-06-15 Thread Zé Loff
On your Zaurus or on your old mac or on your 386 or on your amd64 server or on your VAX or on your sparc64 or...? On 15/06/2013, at 18:37, Tony Berth wrote: > Dear group, > > what is the max RAM the current release can support? > > Thanks > > Tony

Re: max RAM

2013-06-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-06-15, Tony Berth wrote: > on a amd64 server. I don't know if the 4GB limit is still in place. 4.9 is the last release which was limited to 4GB on amd64. http://www.openbsd.org/50.html

Re: max RAM

2013-06-15 Thread Tony Berth
on a amd64 server. I don't know if the 4GB limit is still in place. Thanks Tony On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Zé Loff wrote: > On your Zaurus or on your old mac or on your 386 or on your amd64 server > or on your VAX or on your sparc64 or...? > > On 15/06/2013, at 18:37, Tony Berth wrote

Re: max RAM

2013-06-15 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 07:37:06PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote: > Dear group, > > what is the max RAM the current release can support? > > Thanks > > Tony > Define 'support'. Ken